Theranostics 2012; 2(3):238-250. doi:10.7150/thno.3509

Review

Applications of Functionalized Fullerenes in Tumor Theranostics

Zhiyun Chen, Lijing Ma, Ying Liu Corresponding address, Chunying Chen

CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) License. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
How to cite this article:
Chen Z, Ma L, Liu Y, Chen C. Applications of Functionalized Fullerenes in Tumor Theranostics. Theranostics 2012; 2(3):238-250. doi:10.7150/thno.3509. Available from http://www.thno.org/v02p0238.htm

Abstract

Functionalized fullerenes with specific physicochemical properties have been developed for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Notably, metallofullerene is a new class of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast-enhancing agent, and may have promising applications for clinical diagnosis. Polyhydroxylated and carboxyl fullerenes have been applied to photoacoustic imaging. Moreover, in recent years, functionalized fullerenes have shown potential in tumor therapies, such as photodynamic therapy, photothermal treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapeutics. Their antitumor effects may be associated with the modulation of oxidative stress, anti-angiogenesis, and immunostimulatory activity. While various types of novel nanoparticle agents have been exploited in tumor theranostics, their distribution, metabolism and toxicity in organisms have also been a source of concern among researchers. The present review summarizes the potential of fullerenes as tumor theranostics agents and their possible underlying mechanisms are discussed.

Keywords: Functionalized fullerenes, nanoparticles, cancer diagnosis, cancer therapy, theranostics.

Introduction

Buckminsterfullerene (C60) is a carbon allotrope discovered in 1985 [1]. Since then, fullerenes have attracted much attention and been widely investigated. After the main problem of poor solubility was solved by chemical or supramolecular approaches (usually a chemical modification on the surface of the sphere), various functionalized fullerenes were synthesized to achieve promising results [2]. For example, the empty interior cavity of the fullerene molecule makes it an ideal site for containment of a metal atom to form metallofullerene. This special structure of metallofullerene shows advantages compared to the metal itself or metal chelate complexes. One of their most important and novel electronic properties is the so-called intra-fullerene electron transfer from the encaged metal atom(s) to the fullerene cage(s), which has been suggested to use in MRI [3]. Most likely due to its unique chemical structure, C60 possesses interesting photo-physical properties and generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) by exposure to visible light, making it a potentially strong agent for photodynamic therapy in biological systems [4].

The specific physicochemical properties of fullerenes promoted the development of tumor theranostic; consequently, functionalized fullerenes are currently under extensive investigation due to their potential application to tumor imaging and therapy (Table 1).

 Table 1 

Application of various functionalized fullerenes to tumor theranostics.

ApplicationsTypes of functionalized fullerenesPredominant characteristicsReferences
Cancer diagnosisMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Gd@C82(OH)40higher signal enhancement at a dose of 1/20 of commercial Gd-DTPA[10]
Gd@C82O2(OH)16(C(PO3Et2)2)10high affinity to bone[11]
Gd@C60[C(COOH)2]10excellent cellular uptake efficiency without any adjunctive agent, obtained by a non-chromatographic procedure with more abundant M@C60 fraction[13, 14]
Gd3N@C80[DiPEG(OH)x]the highest relaxivity[15, 16]
Gd3N@C80(OH)∼26(CH2CH2COOM)∼16(M=Na or H)readily synthesized with high yield, further qualified diffusion time[17]
Gd@C82O6(OH)16-(NHCH2CH2COOH)8
Gd3N@C80(OH)26(CH2CH2COOH)16
conjugated to an protein/peptide for “tumor targeted” imaging[18, 19]
Photoacoustic imaging(&Photothermal treatment)C60(OH)xOyNaz“acoustic-explosion” after exposure to laser irradiation[20, 21]
Cancer therapyPhotodynamic therapyC60 conjugated with PEG,/pullulanstrong tumor suppression coupled with light irradiation[26, 27]
125I-C60(OH)xaccumulated in tumors readily and persistently[28]
C60-PEG-Gda good agreement between the time profile of the PDT effect and the detection of positive MRI signal[29]
(γ-CyD)2/C60singlet oxygen -mediated phototoxicity[31, 32]
C60-porphyrininduce carcinoma cell death through either a 1O2-mediated photoreaction process or a free radical mechanism[33]
N-methylpyrrolidinium-fullerene (BB4)induce apoptosis by producing Type 1 ROS[34, 35]
Radiotherapy212Pb@C60 malonic acidsstable during β--decay of 212Pb to 212Bi, attenuates the myelotoxicity of 212Pb[36]
177LuxLu(3-x) N@C80conjugated to IL-13 for RIT[37]
ChemotherapeuticsGd@C82(OH)22efficiently inhibit the growth of murine H22 hepatoma with low toxicity, reverse tumor resistance by enhancing the endocytosis of cisplatin via nanoparticle-mediated penetration[40, 43]
C60(OH)xsignificant tumor inhibition, anti-metastatic activity[41, 42]
C60, C60(Nd)induce autophagy-mediated chemosensitization[44, 62]

Functionalized fullerenes for tumor imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging

Among many imaging strategies, such as optical imaging (OI), computed tomography (CT), MRI, ultrasound (US), and radionuclide imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), MRI is a versatile, non-invasive medical diagnostic technique that can provide both physiological and anatomical information, while not requiring the use of ionizing radiation. In addition, in many applications it is often the most sensitive method available to depict soft tissues. Therefore, it has been extensively used for brain and central nervous system imaging, for assessing cardiac function and for detecting abnormal tissues such as tumors [5, 6]. However, the difference between MR images of normal and abnormal tissues is often not large enough; therefore, specific exogenous contrast agents are often required to increase MR image quality and obtain higher resolution and sensitivity.

Paramagnetic metal ions, especially gadolinium (Gd3+), have been proposed as MR contrast agents. Conventional T1 contrast agents have been developed in the form of more stable and less toxic metallochelates, including gadolinium(III) diethyltriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd(III)-DTPA) and gadolinium-tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (Gd(III)-DOTA), which are currently marketed as Omniscan® and ProHance®, respectively [6, 7]. However, for Gd3+ chelate complexes, the main limitation is the release of metal ions in vivo during metabolic processes and the subsequent toxicity. Since gadolinium-containing metallofullerenes were first used as excellent contrast agents for MRI with relatively high spatiotemporal resolution, they have attracted much attention for their potential application in clinical diagnosis. The Gd3+ ion was encapsulated in the fullerene cage, which is a structure that preserves the properties of the metal ion, avoids any leakage and thus prevents its dissociation in vivo [7]. After specific chemical modifications, various Gd@Cn (n=60, 82) derivatives have been developed and widely explored (Figure 1A, B and C) [8, 9].

Gd@C82(OH)n has shown a water proton relaxivity twenty times higher than the commercially available Gd-DTPA. After intravenous (iv) administration of Gd@C82(OH)40 at a dose of 1/20 of the typical clinical dose of Gd-DTPA, a higher signal enhancement was measured in vivo (Figure 2) [10]. To achieve better bio-distribution, modification of the fullerene cages with biologically active groups has often been proposed. For example, the organic phosphonate modified Gd@C82O2(OH)16(C(PO3Et2)2)10 has exhibited high affinity to bone [11].

 Figure 1 

Depiction of (A) Gd@C60[C(COOH)2]10 [8], (B) Gd@C60(OH)x [8], (C) Gd@C82(OH)22 [9], (D) C60(OH)x [38], (E) C60[C(COOH)2]2 [39]. Adapted with permission from [8].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)
 Figure 2 

(A) T1-weighted MRI of (a)Gd@C82(OH)40 and Gd-DTPA phantom at a concentration of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mmol Gd/L, (B) CDF1 mice before and 30 min after i.v. administration of Gd@C82(OH)40 via tail vein as a dose of 5 μmol Gd/kg [10].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

For a long time, the greatest obstacle to the practical application of Gd@C82 was its low production yield and requirement for potentially laborious HPLC purification. Recently, without the complicated process of purification, Grushko et al. tested the MRI efficiency of a mixture of gadolinium endometallofullerenes (with high content of more than 80 mol.%) and empty fullerenes, and found that the T1-weighted signal intensity was 15~30 times higher than the commercial “Gadovist” contrast agent [12].

After the Gd@C82 contrast agent was developed, another type of gadofullerene derivative, Gd@C60[C(COOH)2]10 was also found to possess a higher relaxivity (4.6 mM-1 s-1 at 20 MHz and 40 °C) compared to that of commercial Gd3+ chelate. It was used as an efficient cellular magnetic resonance imaging label in vitro and a 2.5-fold signal enhancement was shown in T1-weighted MRI of labeled cells compared to control cells. The cellular uptake characteristics of this gadofullerene were significant and nonspecific, and an excellent labeling efficiency (98-100%) was achieved without any adjunctive agent, compared to Gd@C82(OH)40. Furthermore, Gd@C60[C(COOH)2]10 was the first highly soluble, air-stable discrete molecule based on the more abundant M@C60 fraction of metallofullerenes, obtaining by a non-chromatographic procedure [13, 14].

The Gd3N@C80 fullerene exhibiting the highest relaxivity has seen wider use because of the presence of three Gd3+ ions per molecule. Functionalized trimetallic nitride endohedral metallofullerene species Gd3N@C80 [DiPEG5000(OH)x] has been used to perform high water hydrogen MR imaging relaxivity (R1) when used at a lower concentration, with an equivalent efficiency compared with commercial agents. After it was directly infused into a tumor bearing brain, improved tumor delineation was possible in comparison with the intravenously injected conventional Gd3+ chelate [15]. Zhang et al. also compared the 1H MRI relaxivities of Gd3N@C80 fullerenes with PEG of four different molecular weights (350-5000 Da), and found that 350/750 Da PEG derivatives exhibited the highest relaxivity compared to longer chain length ones, 5000 Da PEG derivatives [16]. At nearly the same time, Gd3N@C80(OH)26(CH2CH2COOM)16 (M=Na or H) was readily synthesized by Shu et al. with high yield. The longitudinal and transverse relaxivities R1 and R2 were 50 times larger than those of Gd3+ poly(aminocarboxylate) complexes, such as commercial Omniscan and Magnevist. Furthermore, the new derivatives were more compact, diffused more slowly and lingered for a longer time than commercial agents and Gd3N@C80[PEG5000(OH)x] [17]. These results gave greater impetus to the development of metallofullerenes as MRI contrast agents.

In the previously mentioned studies, most imaging was obtained by directly administering fullerenes into tumor tissue, therefore tumor-targeting is certainly a subsequent challenge for tumor imaging. Antibodies of the green fluorescent protein (anti-GFP) were conjugated to endohedral gadofulleride, Gd@C82O6(OH)16-(NHCH2CH2COOH)8, as a model for “tumor-targeted” imaging agents, and could be detected by using a fluorescent GFP probe. Results revealed that the antibody activity was well preserved after the conjugation, and the MRI activity was higher than that of unconjugated gadofulleride [18]. Recently, a more encouraging result was obtained. A carboxyl functionalized metallofullerene Gd3N@C80(OH)26(CH2CH2COOH)16 was successfully conjugated to an interleukin-13 (IL-13) peptide, the receptor of which was expressed on glioblastoma multiforme cells. This preliminary finding exhibited the potential of functionalized gadolinium metallofullerenes for tumor targeting and imaging [19].

Photoacoustic imaging

Recently, an attractive new therapeutic concept called 'acoustic-explosion' was suggested for some functionalized fullerenes, polyhydroxy fullerenes (PHF; C60(OH)xOyNaz) and carboxy fullerenes (CF; C60(C(COOH)2)3). Concomitant with the exposure to low-intensity (< 102 W cm-2) continuous-wave laser irradiation in the presence or absence of oxygen, sustained glowing of functionalized fullerenes was observed. When this process was performed in cancer cells, a faint pop was heard following irradiation, indicating the photoacoustic properties of functionalized fullerenes. To investigate their potential for cancer imaging, researchers then used a mechanical scanning photoacoustic system with a single transducer to collect the acoustic signal, and embedded it in a phantom together with functionalized fullerenes. After laser irradiation in a water tank, high contrast photoacoustic images of functionalized fullerenes were obtained. Similarly, the photoacoustic imaging experiment yielded promising results in tumor-bearing nude mice. Excellent contrast between tumor and non-tumor regions was shown after intratumoral injection of PHF, and the laser energy used was only one-third of the maximum permissible exposure level of 29.5 mJ cm−2 for a 785 nm pulsed laser as established by the American National Standards Institute [20, 21]. This new finding suggests potential applications of functionalized fullerenes for obtaining photoacoustic images (Figure 3).

 Figure 3 

(A) Visible light emission from functionalized fullerenes irradiated with a 785-nm laser [21]. (B) Photoacoustic imaging and 2-D signal mapping of tumors in living mice before (Left) and after (Right) intratumoral injection of polyhydroxy fullerenes [20].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Functionalized fullerenes for tumor therapy

Photodynamic therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-invasive treatment for various types of tumor. The combination of a photosensitizing agent and focused irradiation is used to elicit specific, controlled production of reactive oxygen species in a localized area, leading to cell destruction through several pathways. By using highly focused light irradiation, photodynamic therapy has the potential to act specifically at the desired site of action with low levels of collateral damage to healthy cells [22]. Fullerenes can efficiently generate reactive oxygen species when exposed to visible light, which means it may be an effective cytotoxic agent. The anatomical characteristics of tumor, such as hyperpermeable vasculature and an immature lymph system, make large-sized substances accumulate and remain longer in tumor tissues than in normal tissues. After the ideal molecular size, water-solubility, and tumor targeting were developed through various modifications, functionalized fullerenes are now available for cancer PDT both in tumor cells and tumor-bearing mice [23-25]. Many researches have been carried out to demonstrate this potential application of functionalized fullerenes.

When C60 was conjugated with polyethylene glycol (PEG), pullulan, etc., strong tumor suppression was shown after the conjugate was injected intravenously into tumor-bearing mice coupled with light irradiation [26, 27]. To confirm tumor uptake of C60(OH)x, 125I-labeled fullerenol, 125I-C60(OH)x were administered to five tumor-bearing mice. The accumulation ratios of 125I-C60(OH)x in tumor compared to normal muscle tissue (T/N) and blood (T/B) at different time points revealed that C60(OH)x could be accumulated in several tumors readily and persistently, especially in mouse H22 hepatocarcinoma, suggesting that it could be used as a good photosensitizer in photodynamic tumor therapy [28]. To elevate the PDT effect by controlling the treatment time, Gd3+-chelated C60-PEG (C60-PEG-Gd) was obtained from mixing gadolinium acetate solution with C60-PEG-DTPA, which was prepared by introducing diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) to the terminal group of C60-PEG. The MRI activity was introduced into the C60-PEG of PDT photosensitizers by the chelate incorporation of Gd3+ ions and provided a non-invasive way to detect the time course of C60-PEG accumulating in the tumor tissue. There was good agreement between the time profile of the PDT effect and the detection of a positive MRI signal. These results indicated that C60 could be a potent photosensitizing agent for photodynamic tumor therapy after proper modifications [29].

Two oxidative mechanisms are considered to be mainly implicated in the photodamage of cells. One is free radicals and the other is singlet molecular oxygen (1O2), generated through electron transfer and energy transfer, respectively. These two mechanisms may be determined by some important factors. For example, C60 induced DNA cleavage occurs mainly through reduced active oxygen radicals such as superoxide anion radical (O2·) and hydroxyl radical (·OH) under physiological conditions, while 1O2 was generated effectively in nonpolar solvents [30]. Besides, aggregation is a well-accepted factor that could deactivate the excited electronic states of photosensitizers and cause further loss of photoreactivity. Zhao et al. found that γ-cyclodextrin bicapped pristine C60 [(γ-CyD)2/C60] was in a monomeric state in water whereas C60(OH)24 was aggregated. It could be used to explain the phototoxicity induced by (γ-CyD)2/C60 toward human keratinocytes. The toxicity was mainly mediated by singlet oxygen and much higher than its water-soluble derivative C60(OH)24 [31, 32]. Compared to Type 2 photochemistry mechanism, Type 1 is more depend on the surrounding oxygen concentration; thus, some functionalized fullerenes acting through the Type 1 pathway may be relatively more effective in hypoxic tumors. C60-porphyrin could induce HepG2 human larynx-carcinoma cell death through either a 1O2-mediated photoreaction process or a free radical mechanism under anaerobic conditions [33]. N-methylpyrrolidinium-fullerene (BB4) was found to be a powerful photosensitizer with the ability to kill cancer cells in vitro and in a mouse model of disseminated peritoneal carcinomatosis after illumination with white light. BB4 can induce apoptosis by producing Type 1 ROS, rather than singlet oxygen, i.e. a Type 2 mechanism [34, 35].

Photothermal treatment

Recently, certain functionalized fullerenes, especially polyhydroxy fullerenes (PHF) and carboxy fullerenes (CF) were found to be heated to their ignition temperature by exposure to low-intensity (< 102 W cm-2) continuous-wave laser irradiation, which was likely because of distortion of the symmetrical cage structure. This heating property would be extremely advantageous for cancer therapy, when a negatively charged PHF coating on silica nanoparticles functionalized with positively charged amine groups was dosed to A549 cells and localized destruction of cells was induced by irradiation with a near-infrared laser [21].

Moreover, when tumors were exposed to near-infrared light after injected with PHF nanoparticles, they decreased in cross-sectional area by an average of 32% within 2 hours of treatment, with only a blister visible 20 hours post-treatment. In addition, a concomitant faint audible sound was heard accompanied by bubble formation and bursting of the irradiated cells after exposure to a 785 nm laser. Thus, the rapid tumor shrinkage may be explained by both photothermal ablation and “acoustic-explosion” mechanisms (Figure 4) [20].

 Figure 4 

Treatment of a mice tumor with polyhydroxy fullerenes. (A) Experimental setup for photothermal ablation of tumor with CP-0.25 (chitosan-polyhydroxy fullerenes) nanoparticles. (B) Photographs of mouse tumor 2 hours (Left) and 20 hours (Right) after laser irradiation, only a blister was visible after 20 hours (within dotted lines). (C) Histological sections of remaining tumor stained with hematoxylin and eosin demonstrate areas of necrosis [20].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine

While the potential of metallofullerenes on MRI was developed vigorously, research on another application of functionalized fullerenes to therapeutic nuclear medicine was also performed. Based on a similar principle, metallic radionuclides encapsulated in fullerenes can be protected in the empty carbon cage stably, eliminating any undesired toxicity induced by the leakage and catabolism of administered radionuclides.

The availability of radio-fullerenes in therapeutic nuclear medicine was then proven by distribution and stability evaluations. Diener et al. prepared the α-emitting 212Pb@C60 malonic acids for the first time and investigated the bio-distribution of the untargeted water-soluble radio-fullerene in mice and its stability during β--decay of 212Pb to 212Bi. It was shown that 212Pb@C60 malonate prevented the 212Pb from accumulation in bone, attenuated the myelotoxicity of 212Pb, and exhibited a rather slow clearance. This radio-fullerene also appeared stable in solution (about 36% of the 212Bi released) [36]. The above results suggested that water-soluble fullerenes might be suitable as cancer radiopharmaceuticals.

Effective targeted delivery of radionuclides is the primary challenge in radio-immunotherapy (RIT). By conjugating the radio-fullerenes with an antibody that is specific for receptors expressed preferentially on the cancer cells, radioisotopes can be delivered to cancer cells. After encapsulation of the β-emitter 177Lu in a fullerene cage, an IL-13 peptide that targets an over-expressed receptor in glioblastoma multiforme tumors was successfully conjugated to the 177LuxLu(3-x)N@C80 [37]. However, the efficiency of these radio-fullerenes for tumor targeting RIT requires further investigation in the living body or tumor cells.

Chemotherapeutics

Besides surgery, chemotherapeutics is another principal method for tumor therapy. However, the high toxicity and easily developed drug resistance considerably confine the chemotherapeutic effect. In recent years, functionalized fullerenes have been found to have some good characteristics to aid with antitumor treatments, and some of them have exhibited the potential for tumor inhibition (Figure 1C, D and E) [9, 38, 39]. In 2005, we found that gadolinium endohedral metallofullerenol (Gd@C82(OH)n nanoparticles) can efficiently inhibit the growth of murine H22 hepatoma without obviously adverse effects on important organs, having nearly no direct toxic effect to tumor cells [40], which is an advantage over conventional anti-tumor drugs. Zhu et al. [41] also tested the tumor-inhibitory effect of C60(OH)x on the same model. In the C60(OH)x-treated group, significant tumor inhibition rates and reduced damage to liver were shown, in accordance to the histological results of inhibited tumor infiltration. Additionally, the anti-metastatic activities of fullerenol C60(OH)20 was observed in cancer metastasis models [42]. Moreover, some fullerenes could increase the chemo-sensitization of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents and result in antitumor drug-mediated cell death, especially in some drug-resistant cancer cells [43, 44]. Thereafter, great attention was focused on the underlying mechanisms of the antitumor activity of fullerenes as follows:

1) Anti-angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is one of the most important factors for the progression of tumor, by supplying tumors with oxygen and nutrients [45]. As tumors can generate their own blood vessels from the surrounding vasculature [46, 47], anti-angiogenesis treatments can inhibit growth and metastasis of various solid tumors [48].

Meng et al. investigated the anti-angiogenic activity of Gd@C82(OH)22 and found that the nanoparticle can simultaneously down-regulate more than 10 angiogenic factors, which was confirmed in vivo by decreasing tumor microvessel density and lowering the nutrient supply to tumor tissues. A similar result was also obtained in another anti-angiogenesis study of C60(OH)20 (Figure 5) [42, 49].

2) Modulation of oxidative stress

ROS such as superoxide radical anion, hydrogen peroxide, singlet oxygen, and hydroxyl radical, which can cause oxidative stress, are considered to be an important part in the mechanism of carcinogenesis. ROS can induce lipid peroxidation, protein fragmentation, DNA damage, damage to tumor-suppressor genes and enhance the expression of proto-oncogenes. It has been reported that various carcinoma cells synthesize ROS at an elevated rate in vitro, and many tumors are under persistent oxidative stress in vivo [42]. As water-soluble fullerenes showed high inhibitory activity on many kinds of tumor growth in mice, and it is well established that fullerenes and their derivatives possess a unique capacity for scavenging ROS [50], the relationship between the two functions of the nanoparticles was investigated.

The ROS scavenging capability of [Gd@C82(OH)22]n was verified by electron spin resonance (ESR) [51], as well as in tumor tissues of C60(OH)20 treated mice [42], which meant that the antitumor mechanism of fullerenes may be related to its capacity to modulate oxidative stress in tumor-bearing models. On the other hand, Injac et al. found that fullerenol C60(OH)24 had protective effects on the primary organs (heart, liver, lung and kidney) against chronic toxicity induced by doxorubicin, and thus may be useful as a potential organo-protector for anticancer therapy [52-55]. These results may increase the feasibility of applying fullerenes to cancer chemotherapeutics.

3) Immunological activity

Our previous studies have demonstrated that water-soluble C60(OH)20 and Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles have specific immunomodulatory effects on T cells and macrophages, and up-regulated the immune response in vivo, including the polarization of the cytokine balance towards Th1 (T-helper cell type 1) cytokines, which particularly increase TNF-α production, a very important factor helping to scavenge and kill tumor cells [9, 38]. These results indicated effective immunological mechanisms of functionalized fullerenes (Figure 6).

 Figure 5 

Mechanism by which C60(OH)20 suppresses carcinoma metastasis in vivo. (A) (A-C) Photos of lungs after soaking in Bouin's solution showing spontaneous pulmonary breast cancer metastases (white arrows). (B) Administration of C60(OH)20 can decrease oxidative stress, the content of angiogenic factors(TNF-α, VEGF and PDGF) and neovascularization in tumor tissues, inhibition of which diminish transmission of cancer cells to lung tissues [42].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)
 Figure 6 

Possible immune-associated pathways by which Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles inhibit the growth of tumors. (A) In comparison to the untreated saline group, IFN-γ and TNF-α expression levels in mouse tumor tissues increased markedly in the group treated with 0.5 mmol/kg/day Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles. (B)The Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles injected in the abdominal cavity are mostly engulfed by macrophages and other phagocytes through phagocytosis, whilst a few enter the blood directly through the peritoneum or mesentery. The Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles stimulate macrophages and T cells to release several kinds of cytokines, such as, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, TNF-α and IFN-γ, which then triggers a series of signal pathways of immune responses and possibly promotes tumor cell apoptosis [9].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Zhang et al. found that Gd@C82(OH)22 could effectively activate dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages, which are the most important antigen presenting cells (APC), as well as up-regulate the expression of co-stimulatory molecules and MHC molecules, thus enhancing the APC function of DCs and macrophages as illustrated by their capacity to activate allogeneic T cells. More evidence was also given to demonstrate the immune activity of Gd@C82(OH)22, which could increase the production of Th1 cytokines and promote macrophages secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α [56, 57].

Moreover, there are few reports about the antigenicity of C60 derivatives. Chen et al. found that mice immunized with the fullerene-bovine thyroglobulin conjugates generated a population of fullerene-specific antibodies of the IgG isotype, including a subpopulation that was cross-reacted with a C70 fullerene [58]. The specificity of the monoclonal antibody for the C60 fullerene was determined by competitive inhibition, and the anti-C60 antibodies were able to interact with single walled carbon nanotubes, which was imaged using atomic force microscopy [59, 60].

4) Overcoming tumor resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs

For cisplatin-resistant cancer (CP-r) cells, Gd@C82(OH)22 alone had no obvious inhibition on tumor growth, although it has been indicated that the metallofullerene could improve the sensitivity of CP-r tumors to cisplatin, as an effective inhibition of CP-r tumors growth was observed following cisplatin plus nanoparticle treatment in vitro and in vivo. Transferrin-labeled experiments have shown that less intracellular transferrin is distributed in CP-r cells than in CP-s cells, indicating a possible defective endocytosis of the CP-r cells. Since nanoparticles have been used as drugs or gene carriers for cancer treatment, it was posited that [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles reverse tumor resistance by enhancing the endocytosis of cisplatin via nanoparticle-mediated penetration through the plasma membrane of the CP-r cells, and this hypothesis was confirmed by increased cisplatin adducts in NP and CP-treated CP-r cells measured by ICP-MS. Restoring defective endocytosis and other related possible mechanisms for overcoming tumor resistance to cisplatin by using fullerenes could lead to new chemotherapies for cancer [43].

5) Autophagy-mediated chemo-sensitization

The main therapeutic goal of cancer treatment is to trigger tumor-selective cell death. One of the cellular pathways receiving much attention in recent years is autophagy, a highly-regulated intracellular process for the degradation of long-lived proteins and damaged organelles. Autophagy can be either a cell death pathway or a cell survival pathway depending on many factors such as the degree of cell damage and intactness of apoptotic pathways [61]. Undoubtedly, promoting autophagy-mediated cell apoptosis is of most concern for tumor therapy.

Zhang et al. have performed comprehensive work on the modulation of autophagy in cancer cells by fullerene C60 nanocrystals. They found that HeLa cells treated with nano-C60 exhibited autophagic features, such as LC3 puncta formation, and many more autophagic vacuoles including autophagosomes and autolysosomes. Nano-C60 at non-cytotoxic concentrations sensitized chemotherapeutic killing of cancer cells in a photo-enhanced and ROS-dependent pathway, which was further verified via GFP-LC3 dot formation that was effectively reduced by free radical scavengers in the dark treatments [44]. A much greater potential in the induction of autophagy by another C60 derivative, C60(Nd), was also reported [62]. All above results prompt that fullerenes might be available to be an efficient chemo-sensitizer in cancer therapy.

Bio-distribution and Toxicity

Although the diverse potential applications of fullerene and its derivatives have been exploited in cancer diagnosis and therapy, it is necessary to consider their biocompatibility and toxicity for organisms prior to their widespread utilization and production. Since fullerene derivatives with different modifications have distinct biological behaviors, understanding these will help in the safe development of fullerene-based drugs [63, 64].

Bio-distribution and excretion

The dynamic distribution of fullerenes within the body is influenced by several factors, including the particle size, various modifications, and administration pathways. Studying these factors can help to identify potential target tissues of fullerene and assess the toxicity at particular target sites.

Unlike oral administration, whereby 14C-labeled C60 is not efficiently absorbed and excreted primarily in the feces, C60 injected intravenously was cleared from the blood circulation rapidly, accumulated mainly within the liver and remained there for a long time, and then was cleared slowly from the liver (nearly all was eliminated 13 days after injection). All these results suggest that the liver is a potential target for fullerene accumulation and toxicity contributes to the metabolism of C60 (C60 metabolites were identified within the liver) and facilitates the removal of fullerenes from the body within the feces [65-67]. By comparison, the water-soluble C60 had a wider tissue distribution, which might be attributed to its more hydrophilic water-soluble character. 99mTc-C60(OH)x injected into mice through tail veins was quickly distributed to all organs except for tissues with limited blood flow, such as muscle. It remained throughout the 48 h of the study, particularly in the kidneys, bone, spleen and liver, and displayed a slow clearance rate except for bone, which showed slightly increasing accumulation within 24 h [68]. This phenomenon was further demonstrated by studying the distribution of 125I-C60(OH)x, which was rapidly distributed to all organs (mainly in the kidneys, liver, bone, spleen and stomach) through the blood circulation and especially exhibited a rapid and high uptake in kidneys, followed by a fast excretion into urine. Likewise, 125I-C60(OH)x was not found in the brain, suggesting it could not penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which was different from the C60 modified with dipolar trimethylenemethane [28].

Similarly, Cagle et al. [69] found that 166Ho@C82(OH)y was distributed throughout the entire body, except for the brain and fat tissues, as early as 1 h after the tail-vein injection, which was different from the finding with metal chelate (Na2[166Ho(DTPA)(H2O)]). Only the concentrations of 166Ho in liver and bone increased from 1 to 4 h, especially in bone, which subsequently displayed a slight increase in concentration over 48 h (Figure 7A). These results were consistent with the observations for the bio-distribution of [Gd@C82(OH)22]n particles. Unlike GdCl3, [Gd@C82(OH)22]n was delivered to almost all observed tissues, but accumulated mostly in bone, suggesting that the fullerene cage could not be destroyed in organisms and that the internal Gd3+ was well protected in the cage. The concentration of Gd in the brain was close to the baseline, suggesting that the [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles could not pass through the BBB either (Figure 7B) [70]. The similar results for the bio-distributions of C60(OH)x and C82(OH)y showed that the biological properties would not be expected to change by incorporation of a metal atom within a fullerene cage. Thus, distribution and biocompatibility of fullerenes were usually assessed through ip and iv injections, and chemical modification to the fullerene cages may play an important role in determining their distribution and biocompatibility.

 Figure 7 

(A) Biodistribution of 166Hox@C82(OH)y in BALB/c mice at 1, 4, 24, and 48 h after injection. The animals were sacrificed, and organs were sampled at 1, 4, 24, and 48 h, followed by measurement of the 166Ho 80.5 KeV γ-emission [69]. (B) Biodistribution of [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice (expressed as concentrations of gadolinium element, ng Gd/g wet weight) [70].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Toxicity evaluation

To understand the toxicity of C60, it is usually necessary to investigate the lethality, gross or microscopic lesions, histopathological change, etc. However, other biological responses, such as stimulation of the immune system, regulation of oxidative stress, and changes on the molecular level induced by fullerenes, should generally be considered as well.

Following the inhalation pathway, C60 and its derivates can be partly deposited in the lungs and internalized by alveolar macrophages; a pulmonary inflammatory response was elicited for a high exposure dose of fullerenols (10 mg/kg) and fullerenols at low concentrations (1 mg/kg) exhibited an anti-inflammatory property. Although slight changes in gene expression level were observed, no obviously toxicity was reported [71, 72]. Only when water-soluble polyalkylsulfonated C60 was administrated at extremely high dose (LD50=600 mg/kg) in an acute toxicity study or at a moderately high dose (up to 60 mg/kg) via ip injection, observable pathological or lethal toxicity was induced. However, in subsequent study of oral exposure, fullerenes were considered to be nontoxic at a dose of 50 mg/kg, which was close to that of ip administration [73]. Even when the dose was increased to 2,000 mg/kg, fullerite (a mixture of C60 and C70) has not shown to cause any acute toxicity. The possible reason is that fullerenes are not effectively absorbed through the alimentary tract [74]. Toxicity assessment of fullerenes should therefore be considered comprehensively, including the exposure routes and the delivered dose, etc.

After fullerenes enter into the body, they may be internalized by different types of cells, and induce various changes inside the cells, such as viability, proliferation, inflammation responses, and oxidative responses. Therefore, the cytotoxicity assessment of fullerenes has been one of the most important aspects to consider when assessing the toxicity of fullerenes [75]. Many related studies have been performed on various cell lines. C60 and quaternary ammonium derivatized C60 inhibited keratinocytes proliferation at a concentration of 2 μM and over a period of 8 days, which is relatively long [66]. In both human skin (HDF) and liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells, water-soluble fullerene species are less cytotoxic than pristine C60, while C60(OH)24 showed no cytotoxicity up to its limits of solubility, suggesting the functional groups on the surface of a fullerene molecule can dramatically decrease the toxicity. However, C60(OH)24 was found to induce cytotoxic morphological changes within the HUVEC cell line in a dose-dependent way, and only maximal doses of fullerenes caused cytotoxic injury and/or death and inhibited cell growth [76]. In nearly every fullerene-related anti-tumor study, fullerenes were not found to have a direct influence on tumor cell viability [9, 38, 40, 42]. The diverse toxicity results of fullerenes reveal that the sensitivity of various tissues or cells to the nanoparticles can be different. Therefore, thorough toxicity evaluation of fullerenes before their clinical application is necessary.

Perspectives

Due to their attractive physical, chemical, and biological properties and the availability of various methods for surface modification, fullerenes and their derivatives have been studied for their numerous biomedical applications, not only in tumor diagnosis and therapy, but also as an anti-HIV agent [77, 78], antimicrobial photosensitizer [79, 80], antioxidants [52, 81, 82], and gene vector [83-85]. Some properties involved in these applications might create new insights into fullerenes as anti-tumor therapeutics, for example, in gene therapy. However, since the underlying mechanisms related to their apparent activities are not yet clear, further research towards a better understanding is urgently needed to investigate the biocompatibility and safe application of functionalized fullerenes as diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (National Basic Research Program: 2011CB933401 and 2010CB934004) and the National Science Foundation of China (21001034 and 10975040) for financial support.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References

1. Kroto HW, Heath JR, O'Brien SC. et al. C60: Buckminsterfullerene. Nature. 1985;318:162-3

2. Bosi S, Da Ros T, Spalluto G. et al. Fullerene derivatives: an attractive tool for biological applications. Eur J Med Chem. 2003;38:913-23

3. Kato H, Kanazawa Y, Okumura M. et al. Lanthanoid endohedral metallofullerenols for MRI contrast agents. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4391-7

4. Arbogast JW, Darmanyan AP, Foote CS. et al. Photophysical properties of C60. J Phys Chem. 1991;95:11-2

5. Liu Z, Kiessling F, Gatjens J. Advanced nanomaterials in multimodal imaging: design, functionalization, and biomedical applications. J Nanomater. 2010

6. Na HB, Hyeon T. Nanostructured T1 MRI contrast agents. J Mater Chem. 2009;19:6267-73

7. Mody VV, Nounou MI, Bikram M. Novel nanomedicine-based MRI contrast agents for gynecological malignancies. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2009;61:795-807

8. Sitharaman B, Bolskar RD, Rusakova I. et al. Gd@C60[C(COOH)2]10 and Gd@C60(OH)x: Nanoscale aggregation studies of two metallofullerene MRI contrast agents in aqueous solution. Nano Lett. 2004;4:2373-8

9. Liu Y, Jiao F, Qiu Y. et al. The effect of Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles on the release of Th1/Th2 cytokines and induction of TNF-alpha mediated cellular immunity. Biomaterials. 2009;30:3934-45

10. Mikawa M, Kato H, Okumura M. et al. Paramagnetic water-soluble metallofullerenes having the highest relaxivity for MRI contrast agents. Bioconjug Chem. 2001;12:510-4

11. Shu CY, Wang CR, Zhang JF. et al. Organophosphonate functionalized Gd@C82 as a magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Chem Mater. 2008;20:2106-9

12. Grushko YS, Kozlov VS, Sedov VP. et al. MRI-contrasting system based on water-soluble fullerene/Gd-metallofullerene mixture. Fuller Nanotub Car N. 2010;18:417-21

13. Bolskar RD, Benedetto AF, Husebo LO. et al. First soluble M@C60 derivatives provide enhanced access to metallofullerenes and permit in vivo evaluation of Gd@C60[C(COOH)2]10 as a MRI contrast agent. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:5471-8

14. Sitharaman B, Tran LA, Pham QP. et al. Gadofullerenes as nanoscale magnetic labels for cellular MRI. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2007;2:139-46

15. Fatouros PP, Corwin FD, Chen ZJ. et al. In vitro and in vivo imaging studies of a new endohedral metallofullerene nanoparticle. Radiology. 2006;240:756-64

16. Zhang JF, Fatouros PP, Shu CY. et al. High relaxivity trimetallic nitride (Gd3N) metallofullerene MRI contrast agents with optimized functionality. Bioconjug Chem. 2010;21:610-5

17. Shu CY, Corwin FD, Zhang JF. et al. Facile preparation of a new gadofullerene-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent with high (1)H relaxivity. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:1186-93

18. Shu CY, Ma XY, Zhang JF. et al. Conjugation of a water-soluble gadolinium endohedral fulleride with an antibody as a magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Bioconjug Chem. 2008;19:651-5

19. Fillmore HL, Shultz MD, Henderson SC. et al. Conjugation of functionalized gadolinium metallofullerenes with IL-13 peptides for targeting and imaging glial tumors. Nanomedicine. 2011;6:449-58

20. Krishna V, Singh A, Sharma P. et al. Polyhydroxy fullerenes for non-invasive cancer imaging and therapy. Small. 2010;6:2236-41

21. Krishna V, Stevens N, Koopman B. et al. Optical heating and rapid transformation of functionalized fullerenes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:330-4

22. Satoh M, Takayanag I. Pharmacological studies on Fullerene(C60), a novel carbon allotrope, and its derivatives. J Pharmacol Sci. 2006;100:513-8

23. Tabata Y, Ikada Y. Biological functions of fullerene. Pure Appl Chem. 1999;71:2047-53

24. Tokuyama H, Yamago S, Nakamura E. et al. Photoinduced biochemical-activity of fullerene carboxylic-acid. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:7918-9

25. Nakajima N, Nishi C, Li FM. et al. Photo-induced cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerene. Fullerene Sci Technol. 1996;4:1-19

26. Liu J, Tabata Y. Photodynamic therapy of fullerene modified with pullulan on hepatoma cells. J Drug Target. 2010;18:602-10

27. Liu J, Tabata Y. Photodynamic antitumor activity of fullerene modified with poly(ethylene glycol) with different molecular weights and terminal structures. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2011;22:297-312

28. Ji ZQ, Sun HF, Wang HF. et al. Biodistribution and tumor uptake of C60(OH)x in mice. J Nanopart Res. 2006;8:53-63

29. Liu J, Ohta S, Sonoda A. et al. Preparation of PEG-conjugated fullerene containing Gd3+ ions for photodynamic therapy. J Control Release. 2007;117:104-10

30. Yamakoshi Y, Umezawa N, Ryu A. et al. Active Oxygen Species Generated from Photoexcited Fullerene (C60) as Potential Medicines: O2-• versus 1O2. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:12803-9

31. Zhao B, He YY, Bilski PJ. et al. Pristine (C60) and Hydroxylated [C60(OH)24] Fullerene Phototoxicity towards HaCaT Keratinocytes: Type I vs Type II Mechanisms. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21:1056-63

32. Zhao B, Bilski PJ, He YY. et al. Photo-induced Reactive Oxygen Species Generation by Different Water-soluble Fullerenes (C60) and Their Cytotoxicity in Human Keratinocytes. Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84:1215-23

33. Alvarez MG, Prucca C, Milanesio ME. et al. Photodynamic activity of a new sensitizer derived from porphyrin-C60 dyad and its biological consequences in a human carcinoma cell line. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38:2092-101

34. Mroz P, Pawlak A, Satti M. et al. Functionalized fullerenes mediate photodynamic killing of cancer cells: Type I versus Type II photochemical mechanism. Free Radical Biol Med. 2007;43:711-9

35. Mroz P, Xia Y, Asanuma D. et al. Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy mediated by a fullerene in a mouse model of abdominal dissemination of colon adenocarcinoma. Nanomedicine. 2011 Doi:10.1016/j.nano.2011.04.007

36. Diener MD, Alford JM, Kennel SJ. et al. Pb-212@C60 and its water-soluble derivatives: Synthesis, stability, and suitability for radioimmunotherapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:5131-8

37. Shultz MD, Duchamp JC, Wilson JD. et al. Encapsulation of a radiolabeled cluster inside a fullerene cage, 177LuxLu(3-x)N@C80: an interleukin-13-conjugated radiolabeled metallofullerene platform. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:4980-1

38. Liu Y, Jiao F, Qiu Y. et al. Immunostimulatory properties and enhanced TNF-α mediated cellular immunity for tumor therapy by C60(OH)20 nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:415102-11

39. Li W, Zhao L, Wei T. et al. The inhibition of death receptor mediated apoptosis through lysosome stabilization following internalization of carboxyfullerene nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2011;32:4030-41

40. Chen C, Xing G, Wang J. et al. Multihydroxylated [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles: antineoplastic activity of high efficiency and low toxicity. Nano Lett. 2005;5:2050-7

41. Zhu JD, Ji ZQ, Wang J. et al. Tumor-inhibitory effect and immunomodulatory activity of fullerol C60(OH)x. Small. 2008;4:1168-75

42. Jiao F, Liu Y, Qu Y. et al. Studies on anti-tumor and antimetastatic activities of fullerenol in a mouse breast cancer model. Carbon. 2010;48:2231-43

43. Liang XJ, Meng H, Wang YZ. et al. Metallofullerene nanoparticles circumvent tumor resistance to cisplatin by reactivating endocytosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:7449-54

44. Zhang Q, Yang WJ, Man N. et al. Autophagy-mediated chemosensitization in cancer cells by fullerene C60 nanocrystal. Autophagy. 2009;5:1107-17

45. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182-6

46. Wang R, Chadalavada K, Wilshire J. et al. Glioblastoma stem-like cells give rise to tumour endothelium. Nature. 2010;468:829-33

47. Ricci-Vitiani L, Pallini R, Biffoni M. et al. Tumour vascularization via endothelial differentiation of glioblastoma stem-like cells. Nature. 2010;468:824-8

48. Kou B, Li Y, Zhang L. et al. In vivo inhibition of tumor angiogenesis by a soluble VEGFR-2 fragment. Exp Mol Pathol. 2004;76:129-37

49. Meng H, Xing G, Sun B. et al. Potent angiogenesis inhibition by the particulate form of fullerene derivatives. ACS Nano. 2010;4:2773-83

50. Yin JJ, Lao F, Fu PP. et al. The scavenging of reactive oxygen species and the potential for cell protection by functionalized fullerene materials. Biomaterials. 2009;30:611-21

51. Yin JJ, Lao F, Meng J. et al. Inhibition of tumor growth by endohedral metallofullerenol nanoparticles optimized as reactive oxygen species scavenger. Mol Pharmacol. 2008;74:1132-40

52. Injac R, Perse M, Obermajer N. et al. Potential hepatoprotective effects of fullerenol C60(OH)24 in doxorubicin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats with mammary carcinomas. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3451-60

53. Injac R, Perse M, Cerne M. et al. Protective effects of fullerenol C60(OH)24 against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity in rats with colorectal cancer. Biomaterials. 2009;30:1184-96

54. Injac R, Boskovic M, Perse M. et al. Acute doxorubicin nephrotoxicity in rats with malignant neoplasm can be successfully treated with fullerenol C60(OH)24 via suppression of oxidative stress. Pharmacol Rep. 2008;60:742-9

55. Injac R, Radic N, Govedarica B. et al. Acute doxorubicin pulmotoxicity in rats with malignant neoplasm is effectively treated with fullerenol C60(OH)24 through inhibition of oxidative stress. Pharmacol Rep. 2009;61:335-42

56. Yang D, Zhao Y, Guo H. et al. [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles induce dendritic cell maturation and activate Th1 immune responses. ACS Nano. 2010;4:1178-86

57. Wang BB, Yang D, Sun BY. et al. An anti-tumor nanoparticle, [Gd@C82(OH)22]n, induces macrophage activation. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11:2321-9

58. Chen BX, Wilson SR, Das M. et al. Antigenicity of fullerenes: Antibodies specific for fullerenes and their characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:10809-13

59. Erlanger BF, Chen BX, Zhu M. et al. Binding of an Anti-Fullerene IgG Monoclonal Antibody to Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2001;1:465-7

60. Braden BC, Goldbaum FA, Chen BX. et al. X-ray crystal structure of an anti-Buckminsterfullerene antibody Fab fragment: Biomolecular recognition of C60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:12193-7

61. Shintani T, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy in Health and Disease: A Double-Edged Sword. Science. 2004;306:990-5

62. Wei PF, Zhang L, Lu Y. et al. C60(Nd) nanoparticles enhance chemotherapeutic susceptibility of cancer cells by modulation of autophagy. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:495101

63. Li YF, Chen C. Fate and Toxicity of metallic and metal-containing nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Small. 2011;7:2965-80

64. Johnston HJ, Hutchison GR, Christensen FM. et al. The biological mechanisms and physicochemical characteristics responsible for driving fullerene toxicity. Toxicol Sci. 2010;114:162-82

65. Yamago S, Tokuyama H, Nakamura E. et al. In-vivo biological behavior of a water-miscible fullerene: C-14 labeling, absorption, distribution, excretion and acute toxicity. Chem Biol. 1995;2:385-9

66. BullardDillard R, Creek KE, Scrivens WA. et al. Tissue sites of uptake of C-14-labeled C60. Bioorg Chem. 1996;24:376-85

67. Gharbi N, Pressac M, Hadchouel M. et al. [60]Fullerene is a powerful antioxidant in vivo with no acute or subacute toxicity. Nano Lett. 2005;5:2578-85

68. Li QN, Xiu Y, Zhang XD. et al. Preparation of Tc-99m-C60(OH)x and its biodistribution studies. Nucl Med Biol. 2002;29:707-10

69. Cagle DW, Kennel SJ, Mirzadeh S. et al. In vivo studies of fullerene-based materials using endohedral metallofullerene radiotracers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5182-7

70. Wang J, Chen C, Li B. et al. Antioxidative function and biodistribution of [Gd@C82(OH)22]n nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;71:872-81

71. Baker GL, Gupta A, Clark ML. et al. Inhalation toxicity and lung toxicokinetics of C60 fullerene nanoparticles and microparticles. Toxicol Sci. 2008;101:122-31

72. Fujita K, Morimoto Y, Ogami A. et al. Gene expression profiles in rat lung after inhalation exposure to C60 fullerene particles. Toxicology. 2009;258:47-55

73. Chen HHC, Yu C, Ueng TH. et al. Acute and subacute toxicity study of water-soluble polyalkylsulfonated C60 in rats. Toxicol Pathol. 1998;26:143-51

74. Mori T, Takada H, Ito S. et al. Preclinical studies on safety of fullerene upon acute oral administration and evaluation for no mutagenesis. Toxicology. 2006;225:48-54

75. Zhao F, Zhao Y, Liu Y. et al. Cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, and cytotoxicity of nanomaterials. Small. 2011;7:1322-37

76. Yamawaki H, Iwai N. Cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerene in vascular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2006;290:C1495-C1502

77. Marchesan S, Da Ros T, Spalluto G. et al. Anti-HIV properties of cationic fullerene derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:3615-8

78. Mashino T, Shimotohno K, Ikegami N. et al. Human immunodeficiency virus-reverse transcriptase inhibition and hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibition activities of fullerene derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2005;15:1107-9

79. Tegos GP, Demidova TN, Arcila-Lopez D. et al. Cationic fullerenes are effective and selective antimicrobial photosensitizers. Chem Biol. 2005;12:1127-35

80. Lu ZS, Dai TH, Huang LY. et al. Photodynamic therapy with a cationic functionalized fullerene rescues mice from fatal wound infections. Nanomedicine. 2010;5:1525-33

81. Srdjenovic B, Milic-Torres V, Grujic N. et al. Antioxidant properties of fullerenol C60(OH)24 in rat kidneys, testes, and lungs treated with doxorubicin. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2010;20:298-305

82. Dugan LL, Lovett EG, Quick KL. et al. Fullerene-based antioxidants and neurodegenerative disorders. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2001;7:243-6

83. Isobe H, Nakanishi W, Tomita N. et al. Nonviral gene delivery by tetraamino fullerene. Mol Pharm. 2006;3:124-34

84. Klumpp C, Lacerda L, Chaloin O. et al. Multifunctionalised cationic fullerene adducts for gene transfer: design, synthesis and DNA complexation. Chem Commun (Camb). 2007:3762-4

85. Sitharaman B, Zakharian TY, Saraf A. et al. Water-soluble fullerene (C60) derivatives as nonviral gene-delivery vectors. Mol Pharm. 2008;5:567-78

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding author: Dr. Ying Liu, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), No.11, 1st North Street, Zhongguancun, Beijing 100190, China. Tel: +86-10-82545526; Fax: +86-10-62656765; E-mail: liuycn.


Received 2011-9-13
Accepted 2011-11-2
Published 2012-3-1