Theranostics 2020; 10(2):462-483. doi:10.7150/thno.37593

Review

Micro/nano-bubble-assisted ultrasound to enhance the EPR effect and potential theranostic applications

Lei Duan1*, Li Yang2*, Juan Jin2, Fang Yang2 Corresponding address, Dong Liu3,4, Ke Hu1, Qinxin Wang1, Yuanbin Yue1, Ning Gu1,2 Corresponding address

1. School of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, P. R. China.
2. State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, P. R. China.
3. West Anhui University, Lu'an, P.R. China
4. Anhui Engineering Laboratory for Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Traditional Chinese Medicine Resources, P. R. China.
*These authors contributed equally to this work.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
Citation:
Duan L, Yang L, Jin J, Yang F, Liu D, Hu K, Wang Q, Yue Y, Gu N. Micro/nano-bubble-assisted ultrasound to enhance the EPR effect and potential theranostic applications. Theranostics 2020; 10(2):462-483. doi:10.7150/thno.37593. Available from http://www.thno.org/v10p0462.htm

File import instruction

Abstract

Drug delivery for tumor theranostics involves the extensive use of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Previously, various types of nanomedicines have been demonstrated to accumulate in solid tumors via the EPR effect. However, EPR is a highly variable phenomenon because of tumor heterogeneity, resulting in low drug delivery efficacy in clinical trials. Because ultrasonication using micro/nanobubbles as contrast agents can disrupt blood vessels and enhance the specific delivery of drugs, it is an effective approach to improve the EPR effect for the passive targeting of tumors. In this review, the basic thermal effect, acoustic streaming, and cavitation mechanisms of ultrasound, which are characteristics that can be utilized to enhance the EPR effect, are briefly introduced. Second, micro/nanobubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging is discussed to understand the validity and variability of the EPR effect. Third, because the tumor microenvironment is complicated owing to elevated interstitial fluid pressure and the deregulated extracellular matrix components, which may be unfavorable for the EPR effect, few new trends in smart bubble drug delivery systems, which may improve the accuracy of EPR-mediated passive drug targeting, are summarized. Finally, the challenging and major concerns that should be considered in the next generation of micro/nanobubble-contrast-enhanced ultrasound theranostics for EPR-mediated passive drug targeting are also discussed.

Keywords: EPR effect, ultrasound, micro/nanobubbles, controlled drug delivery, tumor theranostics

Introduction

Solid tumors exhibit a special microenvironment featuring tortuous vascularity, angiogenesis, and hypoxia [1-3]. Abnormal tumor vasculature, high interstitial fluid pressure, growth-induced solid stresses. And solid stresses from the abnormal stromal matrix are the main limitations that prevent drugs from penetrating the solid tumor [4, 5]. Therefore, the accurate and efficient delivery of theranostic agents into tumor lesions in a controlled manner is critical and remains a significant challenge till date. However, the absence of vascular supportive tissues in tumors results in the formation of leaky vessels with pores (200 nm to 1.2 μm in diameter) [6] and leads to poor lymphatic drainage, which is the structural basis of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. The EPR effect is considered an effective method to achieve the passive targeting of tumor tissues [7, 8]. In preclinical studies, targeted delivery systems based on EPR have demonstrated a remarkable improvement in anticancer efficacy when compared with the efficacy of traditional chemotherapeutic drugs [7-9].

However, numerous parameters (such as vascular permeability and mutation, tumor cell density, and tumor stromal heterogeneity) prevent the successful application of EPR-based theranostics in clinical applications because of tumor heterogeneity [10-15]. Different patients with the same type of tumor, different types and sizes of tumor, and different developmental stages of the same tumor may show different EPR effects [16, 17]. For example, hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma both have high vascular density and exhibit a strong EPR effect, whereas pancreatic and prostate cancers are characterized by low vascular density, resulting in a lower EPR effect [18]. Metastatic tumors have a high degree of necrosis at the central site relative to the primary tumor because of the lack of blood vessels due to the decrease in the EPR effect. Therefore, accurately monitoring and evaluating the EPR conditions of different tumors is essential to formulate personalized EPR-mediated tumor treatment [19].

In recent years, various nanomaterials based on the EPR effect have been used because the sizes of these nanomaterials can be modulated according to the pore sizes in tumor blood vessels. Because different types of tumors have different sized gaps in the endothelial cells, a suitable nanoparticle size must be selected according to the type of tumor. Furthermore, the interception by biological barriers when nanomaterials enter the circulation system also needs to be considered. Particularly, nanoparticles should not be destroyed by the reticuloendothelial system (increased particle size) while maintaining the ability to penetrate the tumor (reduced particle size) [20, 21]. Although the gaps and pores in the wall of tumor vessels may provide a pathway for the exudation of nanoparticles, the intermittence and disorder of the vascular structure reduce the blood flow and intravascular pressure. This may result in the reduction of macromolecular drugs or nanocarriers entering the stroma through the vascular gaps by diffusion [22]. Without further increasing the movement of these drugs via diffusion, the efficiency of delivery will not be significantly improved.

 Figure 1 

Various diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that make the best use of the EPR effect.

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

In view of these challenges, to best leverage the EPR effect in nanomedicine delivery, various diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have been developed (Figure 1). To monitor and evaluate the heterogeneity of the EPR effect in a particular patient, non-invasive imaging techniques (such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET)) have been applied. With the development of contrast agents such as micro/nanobubbles (MNBs) [23-25], magnetic nanoparticles [26, 27], radionuclides, and fluorophores, the EPR effect can be accurately visualized and quantified [28-31]. Nanomaterial-based EPR targeting strategies mainly focus on controlling the size of the drug or carrier and/or using ligands that bind to molecules that are related to the EPR effect. An appropriately sized material can pass through the permeable tumor vascular system and passively accumulate in the tumor tissue via passive targeting. The modification of the ligands on the surface leads to active targeting. The transport of the micro-materials and nanomaterials in tumor tissue is shown in Figure 2. Perfluorocarbon (PFC) nanodroplets can accumulate in the tumor tissue via passive targeting, and the targeted microbubbles and nanobubbles are used to realize active targeting.

 Figure 2 

Transportation of micro/nanobubbles in the tumor tissue.

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)
 Table 1 

Summary of ultrasound classification and acoustic vehicles for tumor theranostics.

Payload classificationUltrasound ClassificationTherapeutic
Substance
VehicleTumor TypeAuthor, Year, Publishing Periodicals, Ref.
ChemicalsLow-frequency UltrasoundPaclitaxel (PTX)poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanobubblesprostate cancerWu, 2017, Int J Nanomedicine, [143]
Endostarlipid microbubblescolon cancerZhang, 2014, Cancer Lett, [164]
High-frequency UltrasoundCilengitide nanoparticles (CGT-NP)phospholipid-based microbubblesgliomasZhao, 2016, J Controlled Release, [165]
Focused Ultrasoundboron drugpolymer microbubblesbrain gliomaFan , 2019, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, [123]
Doxorubicin (DOX)phase-changeable nanodropletsbreast cancerCao, 2018, Theranostics, [124]
Doxorubicin(DOX)lipid microbubblesbrain tumorPark, 2017, J Control Release, [166]
Nanoparticles (NPs)Low-frequency UltrasoundGold nanoparticles and Gemcitabine and miR-21 InhibitorDendrimer-Entrapped Gold
Nanoparticles
pancreatic cancerLin, 2018, Theranostics, [167]
High-frequency Ultrasoundsuperparamagnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and Anethole dithiolethione (ADT)magnetic nanoliposome (AML)HepG2Liu ,2017, ACS nano, [129]
superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and RGD‐l‐TRAILmagnetic microbubbles (Polymer microbubbles)
.
colon cancerDuan, 2016, Adv Funct Mater, [128]
Focused Ultrasoundsuperparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO)- Doxorubicin (DOX)lipid microbubblesrat cerebral gliomaFan , 2016, Theranostics , [168]
Therapeutic gasesLow-frequency UltrasoundO 2, Paclitaxel (PTX)Lipid Microbubbleovarian cancerLiu, 2015 Cancer Lett, [169]
NO/DOXUltrasound responsive
liposome
breast cancer/
pancreatic cancer
Wang, 2017, J Control Releae [170]
CO2Hollow Mesoporous Silica
Nanoparticle
pancreatic cancerZhang, 2015, Theranostics, [171]
Focused UltrasoundNOHollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticlespancreatic cancerZhang, 2016, Acs Nano, [172]

To enhance the efficacy of delivery, three approaches based on the EPR effect have been developed. The first approach involves exerting physical exogenous factors (light [32-34], heat [35-37], ultrasound [38-41], and radiation [42, 43]) to promote the permeability of tumor blood vessels and tissues. The second is to develop tumor microenvironment-targeted smart responsive nanomaterials to improve the permeability and retention of drugs at the tumor site [44-48]. The third is to combine the internal biochemical response with external regulatory factors. Some micro-nano materials have special properties because of which they can respond to internal and external triggers. Using a series of biological effects generated during such a response, the drug delivery efficiency at the tumor site can be further improved. In this review, we summarize the EPR effects based on ultrasound and MNBs and the enhancement of these effects. First, the physical effects of ultrasound on EPR are briefly introduced. The interaction between EPR- and MNB-assisted acoustic energy is highlighted. Finally, some new trends in smart bubble drug delivery systems are summarized and speculated for future cancer theranostics.

Ultrasonic effects and enhancement on EPR

Acoustic transducers are used to generate transverse or longitudinal waves with frequencies greater than 20 kHz. Medical ultrasound is characterized by a broad frequency range of 0.1-50 MHz and peak negative pressures of 0.01-10 MPa. It can be classified into focused and unfocused ultrasound depending on the radiation distribution of transducers. It can also be characterized into continuous and pulsed ultrasound depending on the waveform and with parameters such as pulse length and pulse repetition frequency. When used in biomedical applications, the acoustic densitometry of ultrasound can be expressed in the following manner. Sonic intensity can be defined as the time-averaged rate of sonic energy-flow through unit area [49]. Ultrasound with a sonic intensity higher than 5 W/cm2 is generally referred to as high-intensity ultrasound, while that with an intensity between 0.5 and 1 W/cm2 is usually considered to be low-intensity ultrasound. In clinical ultrasound imaging, the output levels of the ultrasound equipment can be quantified using the mechanical index (MI) defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). MI is expressed as the ratio of in situ peak negative pressure (PnP) to the square root of the center frequency (Fc), as shown in Equation (1):

Theranostics inline graphic  (1) 

In general, the maximum output levels of diagnostic devices are limited to an MI of 1.9, which is the maximum allowed value for clinical imaging applications without microbubbles [50]. Incompressible drug carriers such as micelles and liposomes can be applied with the maximum MI of 1.9, while compressible material such as microbubbles should be applied with the maximum allowable MI of 0.8 [51].

When ultrasonic energy is applied for the diagnosis and treatment of tumors, acoustic waves can be used to enhance the EPR in two ways: drug release and bioeffects. During drug release, ultrasound can stimulate the carrier to release its cargo and increase the distribution concentration of drugs in the tumor. The efficiency of drug release is controlled by acoustic parameters such as ultrasound frequency, power density, and pulse duration [52, 53]. Alexander et al. [54] compared the effects of continuous wave (CW) and pulsed ultrasound on doxorubicin (DOX) uptake by HL-60 cells. The drug uptake increased with a pulse duration in the range 0.2-2 s, and was comparable with CW ultrasound (10 s pulse) when a pulse with a duration of 2 s was applied. High-frequency ultrasound exhibits sharper focusing than low-frequency ultrasound, whereas low-frequency ultrasound penetrates the interior of the body deeper than high-frequency ultrasound. The typical penetration depth of 1-MHz ultrasound for various tissues is generally a few millimeters. In contrast, low-frequency ultrasound (20-100 kHz) can penetrate depths reaching tens of centimeters in some types of tissues. High-frequency ultrasound has, therefore, been advantageous for use in the targeted delivery of drugs to small superficial tumors, whereas low-frequency ultrasound is beneficial for treating large and deeply located tumors [55]. For all frequencies studied [52], the drug release increases with increasing power density.

For bioeffects, the use of acoustic energy with EPR mainly focuses on the enhancement of cell membrane permeability [51]. For example, Liu et al. [56] found that compared with other treatment intensities, ultrasonic exposure at 1 MHz and 0.25 W/cm2 can promote the platelet penetration of gold nanoparticles (GNPs). The results indicated that ultrasound can enhance membrane permeability, which has been proved using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Besides, acoustic waves interact with drug carriers, body tissues, and cell membranes via a combination of thermal and mechanical effects [53]. The key mechanisms by which EPR interacts with acoustic waves are mechanical and thermal energy. Low-intensity ultrasound (0.51 W/cm2) is known to be non-thermal, and this may be regarded as the boundary between mechanical and thermal effects.

Mechanical effects

The mechanical effects of ultrasound and MNB-assisted ultrasound on EPR are based on both acoustic radiation forces and mechanical bioeffects.

Acoustic radiation force

Because of the momentum exchange between the object and the sound field, an acoustic wave can move suspended micro-objects by exerting a force known as the acoustic radiation force (ARF) [57].

The various forces that act on an air bubble in a sound field are often referred to as Bjerknes forces [58], which include two physical phenomena: primary Bjerknes forces and secondary Bjerknes forces. The force that influences the microcapsule via the ''primary'' (external) sound field is called the primary Bjerknes force and can be expressed as Equation (2). Assuming that the microcapsules are spherical and placed in an ideal plane ultrasonic wave, the force acts to propel the capsules in the direction of acoustic propagation as per the following equation:

Theranostics inline graphic  (2) 

where P is the mean energy density of the incident wave, Yp is a dimensionless factor known as the radiation force function that depends on the scattering and absorption properties of the capsule, and r is the radius of the capsule.

The force between two bubbles that is caused by the ''secondary'' sound fields emitted by other bubbles is known as the secondary Bjerknes force [59]. The secondary Bjerknes force is given by Equation (3):

Theranostics inline graphic  (3) 

where < > denotes the time average, ρ is the density of the liquid, d is the distance between the first bubble and the second one, V1 and V2 describe the volume of the first and second bubbles, respectively, and er denotes the radial unit vector. The mutual interaction forces between two small coupled gas bubbles (R0<10 μm) in a strong low-frequency acoustic field (Pa>1 bar, f = 20 kHz) have been investigated in a previous study [59] using the Keller-Miksis equations. The nonlinear resonance of bubbles leads to secondary Bjerknes forces between the bubbles that are stronger by a factor of 103-106 than that expected from linear approximations.

The EPR effect would be considerably increased if the agent was initially concentrated in a particular region, and if the velocity of the agent passing the potential binding site was decreased. Dayton et al. [60] demonstrated that the radiation force of ultrasound can displace a microbubble contrast agent to the wall of a 50-mm blood vessel, significantly reduce the velocity of the flowing contrast agents, and produce reversible aggregation. Such microbubble aggregates in large vessels were observed optically under the influence of acoustic radiation force by Wang et al. [61]. The first acoustic radiation force intravascular ultrasound transducer was designed to translate microbubbles to the vessel wall under flow velocities comparable with that in the human common carotid artery to enhance the binding efficiency of intravascular microbubbles and drug delivery [62].

Acoustic streaming

Acoustic streaming is defined as the radiation force from reflectors and scatterers in an ultrasonic field that can cause local particle displacements and fluid currents. The movement of localized fluid currents in the direction of the propagating ultrasound radiation forces that are induced by sound waves is termed bulk streaming. Microstreaming involves localized eddies or currents that are generated next to cavitating bodies. The differences between bulk streaming and microstreaming are shown in Figure 3. The acoustic streaming effect can be used to displace particles in the blood [63] or change the motion of blood flow [64]. These mechanical actions generated by ultrasound may result in the release of drugs from carriers and the associated movement of the drug into the targeted tissue [65]. Microstreaming with bubbles or particles plays an important role in in vitro low-frequency sonophoresis [66].

With the same acoustic-pressure amplitude, the maximum streaming velocity of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) microbubbles is achieved under the action of resonance frequency. The velocity fields of the streaming sonicated UCA microbubbles were measured using particle image velocimetry (PIV) in a blood vessel model [67]. The maximum streaming velocity was approximately 60 mm/s at a resonance frequency of 2.25 MHz, and the streaming velocity decreased to 15 mm/s at 1.0 MHz for the same amplitude of acoustic pressure.

 Figure 3 

Bulk streaming and microstreaming in the blood vessel.

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Stable and inertial cavitation

Gas-filled bubbles show different oscillation performances when acoustic parameters such as the pulse length, amplitude, and frequency are varied. The stable cavitation (SC) of UCAs is usually accomplished at low sound pressures (<0.1 MPa). When exposed to sufficiently large acoustic rarefactional pressure amplitudes, UCAs undergo a violent collapse known as inertial cavitation (IC) [68]. This phenomenon results in the generation of shock-waves, broadband acoustic emissions [69], jetting [70], and microstreaming [69]. These effects have been identified as key mechanical triggers for various medical [40, 71] and industrial applications [72-74].

The difference between SC and IC is due to the different degrees of bubble deformation under ultrasonic irradiation. Many models have been developed to describe the deformations that can occur on the surface of a coated bubble because of oscillation. Marmottant et al. [75] presented a model that incorporates the effect of coating on the response of a microbubble to ultrasound. Based on the US-induced SC or IC, UCAs have wide applications in medical diagnosis and treatment such as contrast harmonic imaging and ultrasound-induced gene/drug delivery [76-78].

Mechanical-effect-enhanced EPR

For US-induced SC or IC of MNBs, MNBs are either excited, causing them to oscillate and mechanically massage the vascular wall, or are destroyed, generating micro-jets. These mechanical effects can lead to the creation of pores in the cell membrane. The opening of the inter-endothelial junctions contributes to an enhancement in the vessel permeability and improves the extravasation of co-administered drugs [79].

MNB-mediated sonoporation occurs because of the physical perturbation of cellular structures [80]. Marmottant et al. [81] controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by a single oscillating bubble. They found that gentle bubble oscillations are sufficient to achieve the rupture of lipid membranes.

The enhanced efficiency can be evaluated through the accurate measurement of the spatial and temporal scales of these pores. Some methods are available to measure these pores. SEM and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have both been employed to obtain information about pores [82-85]. The transmembrane current (TMC) of a single cell under a voltage clamp can also be used for monitoring sonoporation in real-time [86].

Thermal effects

When a blood vessel is located near the focal spot, a part of the acoustic energy is absorbed and converted to thermal energy. Tissues may have different sensitivities to ultrasound-induced damage. This sensitivity to the effects of ultrasound-induced heating has primarily been studied by Stanley et al. [87]. Thermal conversion efficiency is related to protein content and blood perfusion. For example, it has been reported that the absorption coefficient increases as a function of the protein content, which has a positive effect on the ultrasound-induced increase in temperature. Furthermore, biological tissue with poor blood perfusion can also be significantly heated by ultrasound because of slow heat dissipation [87].

Thermal-effect-enhanced EPR

Ultrasound energy can be absorbed and transformed into thermal energy in tissues as the acoustic waves propagate through the tissue and generate friction [51]. Mild hyperthermia in a tumor (41-43 °C for 10-60 min) may improve the therapeutic efficacy of drugs by acting on tumor hemodynamics [88]. The mild hyperthermia induced by focused ultrasound may, therefore, enhance drug or drug carrier extravasation in tumor tissue [65]. In a previous study, a thermo-sensitive liposome was designed [89], and the results showed that drug release can be triggered by mild hyperthermia when the temperature is just above the normal physiological temperature.

Estimating the efficiency of the temperature rise caused by radiation of ultrasound is critical. When the distance between the surface of the blood vessel and the focal point is 2.5 mm, the temperature at the focal point was saturated after approximately 50 s of radiation, and the maximum cooling caused by the blood flow was approximately 0.5 °C when the supply of radiation was ceased [90]. Based on the thermal wave model of bioheat transfer, Tan et al. numerically investigated the influence of blood vessels on temperature during high-intensity focused ultrasound hyperthermia [91]. The results showed that a longer duration of thermal relaxation leads to the production of smaller thermal lesions.

MNB-assisted ultrasonic evaluation and its enhancement on EPR

MNBs comprise a gaseous core encapsulated in a shell of biocompatible materials such as lipids or proteins, typically ranging from 0.1 to 10 μm in diameter. When exposed to ultrasound, MNBs can contract and expand, which may result in backscattering of the ultrasound, cavitation, or even bursting of the shell. Because of these acoustic behaviors, MNBs have been extensively used as UCAs and have shown increasing potential for drug delivery. Under low-intensity ultrasound irradiation, MNBs can be used as contrast agents in ultrasound imaging for EPR evaluation. Through high-intensity ultrasound-mediated cavitation, EPR mediated therapy can be improved with enhanced drug delivery.

MNBs and ultrasound response of MNBs

MNBs

The materials of the encapsulated gas and shell together determine the physicochemical properties of a bubble. The transport properties of the encapsulated core gas mainly affect the stability of the bubbles. Air and bioinert heavy gases such as sulfur hexafluoride or perfluorocarbons are often used in commercial UCAs found in clinics. One approach to increase the stability of UCAs is to use insoluble gases. For example, perfluorocarbons have a higher resistance to water permeation than to air [92, 93]. Recently, bioactive gases that have significant therapeutic potential, including nitric oxide [94, 95] and oxygen [96, 97]; have been encapsulated in UCAs for parenteral delivery.

The performance of MNBs primarily depends on the physicochemical properties of the shell material. Proteins, polymers, and lipids are mainly used as shell materials for bubbles. The echogenicity of MBs and NBs is significantly different because of the size difference. MBs possess good echogenicity and have been widely used for ultrasound imaging. A reduction in the size reduces the acoustic response of the bubble [98]. The microbubbles may be more useful in inducing vessel permeability than nanobubbles due to their larger volume change and higher acoustic response under the ultrasound radiation. The echogenicity of NBs can be improved via shell modification and bubble aggregation. Research has shown that NBs are more stable and exhibit a longer circulation time than MBs [99]. However, extravasation is different in MBs and NBs. The size of MBs is usually in the order of a few microns. MBs are used as blood pool contrast agents because they are transported after intravenous injection into the bloodstream [100], where they either remain in circulation until taken up by the spleen or the liver or are dissolved over short periods. Typically, tumor vessels are permeable to particles smaller than 1 μm [101]. Based on these premises, MBs cannot escape the capillaries and enter the defective tumor microcirculation via the EPR effect. Compared with MBs, NBs can penetrate the sites where tumor vascular leakage takes place via EPR and can accumulate in the tumor. The gaps between the endothelial cells in tumors, therefore, allow passive targeting with NBs. Fluorescent dye-labeled NBs have been found in the intracellular spaces of tumor cells [99]. NBs are also more stable and exhibit longer circulation time than MBs, which leads to further accumulation in tumors. In vivo studies have confirmed the ability of NBs to passively target tumor tissues via the EPR effect [99]. The accumulation of NBs in the tumor area can lead to higher quality imaging and more effective drug delivery. Cavalli et al. showed that amphiphilic drugs and negatively charged complexes can be simultaneously loaded into a NB, which indicates their theranostic capability [102].

Vascular permeability enhancement through ultrasound-mediated MNBs

The mechanical effects that ultrasound-mediated MNBs have on the EPR are associated with the process of cavitation, which is mainly due to the oscillation of gas-filled bubbles in an acoustic field. MNBs have different responses to external stimulation based on the features of the applied ultrasound, as shown in Section 2 in the review. Under diagnostic frequency and low sound pressure (<0.1 MPa), bubbles expand and contract with a small amplitude, and the generated energy is low enough to form an SC. This regular oscillation can echo the ultrasonic wave utilized by ultrasound imaging. The SC can create a circulating flow of fluid around the bubble, which is known as microstreaming. Under higher sound pressures (>0.1 MPa), the oscillation of the bubble becomes nonlinear and the expanded diameter is much larger, causing the microbubbles to oscillate drastically. When the sound pressure exceeds a certain threshold, the bubbles instantaneously collapse to release strong jets, shock waves, and shear force (IC). Both SC and IC lead to the creation of pores in the cell membrane and the opening of interendothelial junctions, thus enhancing vessel permeability and improving the extravasation of co-administered drugs [38].

Inducing cavitation via MNBs changes the vascular and cell membrane permeability of a tumor. Both SC and IC can cause mechanical disturbance to the vessel walls and cell membranes in cancer tissue, thus improving the EPR effects in the tumor. The application of ultrasound to vessels containing MNBs can change the permeability of the blood vessel wall, resulting in the extravasation of drugs into the interstitial space. The change in the permeability of the capillaries depends on various factors, including shell composition, bubble size, the ratio of capillary diameter to bubble diameter, and ultrasound parameters. In addition to changing the permeability of the blood-vessel wall, the cavitation of MNBs can enhance the permeability of a cell membrane. The collapse of a bubble and the associated production of a jet can instantly break adjacent cell membranes. Small holes are produced within a cell membrane, resulting in either repairable or non-repairable sonoporation. With different ultrasound parameters, short-lived pores are produced within the cell membrane and exogenous materials can thus be transported into the cytoplasm. The collapse of MNBs can also cause cell death in the tumor tissue, which further alleviates solid stress and can reduce the barriers to deeper penetration. Studies have shown that cavitation effects can alter vascular and cell membrane permeability through three different mechanisms: (1) During the regular mechanical disturbance of the oscillating bubbles undergoing SC, the cell membrane potential is changed to promote endocytic uptake [103, 104]. (2) The volume of the oscillating bubble changes during the transition from SC to IC. The gap between the vascular endothelial cells is temporarily increased and the integrity of the vascular endothelium is destroyed, thereby allowing enhanced diffusion of the active substances, which can then enter the tissue [71, 105, 106]. (3) Based on the sonoporation produced by IC, transient pores are generated within the vascular endothelial cells, which promote the uptake of intracellular macromolecules [86, 107-109].

Cavitation is directly affected by various factors, such as ultrasound frequency, intensity, and the length of US pulses, which in turn influence the EPR in the biological tissues or cells. Low-frequency ultrasound (20-100 kHz) can penetrate the tissues deeper than high-frequency ultrasound (1-3 MHz). Transdermal transport and cell penetration are enhanced as the US frequency decreases [110, 111]. Yang et al. [112] experimentally demonstrated the cavitation of polymer shelled MBs mediated by ultrasound fields of different frequencies and sound pressures. MBs loaded with Fe3O4 nanoparticles ruptured and released the nanoparticles into the cells under exposure to ultrasound. The results showed that cells internalized the Fe3O4 nanoparticles released by the MBs most efficiently at 1 MHz and 0.25 MPa. The pores in the cell membrane can be simultaneously repaired by the lysosomal membrane associated protein (LAMP-1). When the sound pressure exceeded 0.25 MPa, the severe nonlinear oscillation of the microbubbles may have caused permanent damage to the cells. It has been found that high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles can open the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which provides a means for treating brain tumors. Pulsed US causes less negative biological interactions with healthy cells and tissues not intended for treatment [113]. For medical purposes, the use of pulsed US is, therefore, more favorable than the use of CW. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), which can focus US intensity at the target site, has been developed for ablating various types of live tissue [114]. This treatment is known to have irreversible thermal effects, including hemostasis and blood vessel occlusion. However, the pulsed-HIFU (pHIFU) treatment can reduce these irreversible thermal effects by reducing the average intensity of US at the target tissue. This pulsed-HIFU (pHIFU) method has been developed to enhance the extravasation and tissue penetration of nanoparticles in the femoral tissue of mice [115].

In addition to cavitation, MNBs can also generate other biological effects, such as thermal effects, under the guidance of high-intensity ultrasonic energy. These biological effects work together to temporarily enhance the permeability of biological tissues and blood vessels, allowing the active substances carried in the MNBs to enter the tumor tissue more easily through the EPR effect, which is the theoretical basis of ultrasound-assisted MNB-enhanced EPR.

MNB-assisted ultrasonic evaluation of EPR

The high heterogeneity of EPR among individual patients is considered a major barrier to the clinical application of nanomedicines. In preclinical validation, drug delivery systems generally work very well, with significant improvements in both target site accumulation and therapeutic efficacy. Clinically, however, the efficacy of passive tumor-targeted nanomedicines is compromised because of the large inter- and intra-individual variability in EPR. Significant increases in tolerability but hardly any increases in efficacy have been seen in clinical therapy [10, 11, 19]. Consequently, it is necessary to develop methods to visualize and characterize the EPR effect before treatment. Based on the assessment of individual EPR, patients presenting with sufficiently high levels of EPR, pre-stratify responders, and non-responders could be pre-selected to individualize and improve nano-chemotherapeutic treatments.

Ultrasound contrast imaging is a simple, non-invasive imaging modality used to evaluate vascular conditions. However, tumors are characterized by tortuous vascularity, angiogenesis, and hypoxia. To address these problems, different strategies for MNB-enhanced ultrasound imaging based on EPR have been developed. One important factor to be considered in ultrasound imaging is the accumulation of MNBs in tumor tissue. As mentioned above, NBs of an appropriate size can penetrate the leakage sites of tumor vascular tissue. EPR-mediated passive targeting can result in the accumulation of NBs in the tumor. However, the enhancement of ultrasound imaging by nanobubbles is reduced relative to microbubbles [115] in clinical applications. Therefore, it is important to maintain its ability to enhance ultrasound imaging while the bubble size is reduced. A sufficient aggregation of NBs within the tumor is beneficial for a high quality image and can be used for enhanced ultrasound imaging of a tumor [116]. The shell composition of the bubbles can also be adjusted to increase the echo signals of bubbles in an ultrasonic field. Studies have shown that the incorporation of magnetic nanoparticles into bubble shells can enhance ultrasound imaging [117, 118], which could be used to improve the imaging ability of NBs.

Although MBs cannot pass through blood vessels and enter tumor tissue, efforts can be made to allow them to accumulate around the blood vessels of the tumor. Angiogenesis is a remarkable characteristic in the tumor microenvironment. Endothelial cells and receptors associated with angiogenesis are readily accessible for targeting with MBs. The conjugation of ligands onto the surface of MBs has already been proven successful for MB accumulation in tumors for imaging purposes. It has been reported that a better ultrasound signal was detected from MBs in angiogenic areas after the conjugation of arginylglycylaspartic acid (RGD) peptides onto the MB surfaces [119].

Another important factor in contrast ultrasound imaging for EPR characterization is to identify the correlation between the imaging parameters of tumor blood vessels and drug accumulation in tumors. A US-based assessment of tumor vascularization can potentially be used to predict the efficiency of passive tumor targeting. EPR assessment based on ultrasound imaging is simple, general, and easily transformed for clinical use. In an exemplary preclinical study [28], the relative blood volume (rBV) in tumors was assessed using contrast-enhanced US imaging. The rBV values were correlated with the tumor accumulation of HPMA-based polymeric drug carriers. A good positive correlation was observed, supporting the fact that imaging vascular parameters such as rBV may be useful in predicting EPR-mediated tumor targeting. Applying multi-modal imaging (MRI, μCT, US, and microscopy), Sulheim correlated the accumulation of polystyrene nanoparticles in different tumor models with parameters such as the functionality of tumor vessels measured via the inflow of MBs using US [31]. The density of functional blood vessels measured by fluorescence microscopy was significantly correlated (p = 0.0056) with nanoparticle accumulation, and the inflow of microbubbles measured with ultrasound also showed a moderate, but significant (p = 0.041), correlation with nanoparticle accumulation, indicating that both the number of vessels and the vessel morphology and perfusion can predict nanoparticle accumulation. This indicates that blood vessel characterization using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging or other methods could be valuable in patient stratification for treatment with nanomedicines.

MNB-assisted ultrasonic enhancement of EPR

MNBs can act as carriers for therapeutic payload delivery. Therapeutic payloads including therapeutic gas, targeting ligands, drug molecules, and nanoparticles can be loaded into the bubble.

The delivery of drugs used for chemotherapy suffers from many problems including severe side effects and the resistance of tumor cells [120]. MNBs can be developed as multifunctional carriers for drug transport and delivery. The drugs encapsulated in MNBs are protected from intracellular reactions. MNBs can mediate drug delivery in tumors through EPR effects or active targeting. Particularly, when combined with ultrasound, drug delivery can be controlled and enhanced in tumors. A fluid flow is created when MNBs undergo oscillation mediated by ultrasound [121]. This phenomenon increases the drug convection inside the blood vessels and elevates the accumulation of a drug in the surrounding tumor tissues through the EPR effect, resulting in the increased therapeutic index of a drug [121, 122]. Local US application can further induce a transient increase in the endothelial cell membrane permeability to enhance the uptake of therapeutic agents by the target cells. Fan et al. proposed a boron-polymer/microbubble complex (B-MB)-assisted focused ultrasound (FUS) treatment for brain glioma [123]. B-MBs can simultaneously achieve the safe opening of the blood-brain tumor barrier and enhance boron drug delivery into the tumor tissue using FUS sonication. Cao et al. reported the release of an anticancer drug (DOX) from phase-changeable nanodroplets triggered by low-intensity FUS (LIFU) [124]. They found that the intratumoral accumulation and distribution of a drug with LIFU exposure was significantly enhanced. The combination of ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine is now under phase-II clinical trials for the treatment of pancreatic cancer [125].

Nanoparticles (NPs) such as gold and superparamagnetic iron oxide NPs are widely used in tumor diagnosis and treatment. The delivery of these NPs at the tumor-specific site is a challenging task. Small nanoparticles (<5 nm) can be rapidly removed from vessels by renal clearance or uptake by the liver, whereas large particles (>200 nm) are removed by the spleen or the reticuloendothelial system (RES) [126, 127]. NPs can be delivered to specific cancer tissue only by designing a proper carrier system and avoiding the delivery of the drug to normal tissues. MNBs can be used as carriers to deliver NPs to the tumor tissue site via the enhanced EPR effect. NPs are often loaded into the shell of MNBs and delivered to tumor cells in a process controlled by ultrasound. A typical example is the delivery of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) NPs through MNBs. Different types of bubble related carriers including magnetic microbubbles [128] and magnetic nanoliposomes [129] have been developed for in situ microbubble generation. Combined with US, SPIO NPs were locally released at the tumor and taken up by the tumor cells though EPR effects. These bubble-based magnetic carriers offer an attractive possibility for clinical MR imaging, hyperthermia, and the magnetically targeted release of therapeutic agents for cancer.

Gaseous molecules including oxygen (O2), nitric oxide (NO), hydrogen sulfide, and carbon monoxide have important physiological roles or can elicit biological responses. Therefore, they have significant therapeutic potential [130]. These bioactive gases are much smaller than classical drugs and can easily diffuse across the barriers within vessels and cell membranes [130]. While the therapeutic effect of a gas is concentration dependent, a major hurdle in biomedical application is the controlled and site-specific delivery of the gas. Compared with solid carriers, MNBs are good containers for gas, with effective loading and controlled release. It is estimated that at least 50-60% of advanced solid tumors contain hypoxic tissue, which is a significant factor leading to the resistance of tumors to treatment [131]. Vaupel et al. developed O2 nanobubbles for spontaneous oxygenation in response to the tumor microenvironment [131]. The intratumoral O2 level can be significantly increased by the O2 released from O2 nanobubbles that have been passively accumulated within the tumor because of the EPR effect. NO plays a critical role in vascular physiology and cancer biology. At low concentrations, NO promotes tumor cell growth by stimulating angiogenesis, while at high concentrations, NO is cytotoxic and may be a useful chemotherapeutic agent [132]. MNBs can protect NO from endogenous scavengers and provide an opportunity for targeted delivery, thus providing a therapeutic potential for cancer.

Advanced ultrasonic carriers and manipulation

MNBs can effectively enhance the ultrasound echo signals for evaluating the EPR effect of a tumor; at the same time, modifications can be made to the membrane shell structure, allowing the easy loading or coupling of other contrast agents, drugs, and targets. Mediated by an ultrasonic field, MNBs can also lead to various useful biological effects such as cavitation and hyperthermia to enhance EPR and achieve a synergistic interaction. Therefore, studies on MNB-based theranostic drug-loading systems have received extensive attention in recent years.

Adjustable size modulation strategy

The EPR effect is strongly dependent on the size of nanomedicines. If the nanomedicines are too large, they will not be able to leak through the tumor blood vessels into the solid tumor. If they ate too small, they will be quickly removed by the kidneys. Even if the nanoparticles reach the tumor tissue through the blood vessels, the difference in size affects their ability to spread further. Therefore, the design of a drug carrier with adjustable size can promote the penetration and enrichment of a drug inside a tumor. The special properties by which MNBs respond to an external field can be used to change the size of MNBs under the guidance of an external field such as ultrasound and temperature. This can be achieved by devising ingenious designs of the membrane and the gas core component, thus forming an effective diagnostic and therapeutic carrier. At present, two strategies are applied for size adjustment of MNBs: one is "small to large" and the other is "large to small".

The “small to large” strategy is mainly used in EPR targeting to overcome the contradiction between particle size and the sound intensity of the contrast agent. Nanobubbles exhibit in vivo stability and can even reach the interstitial space through the vascular endothelium, providing enhanced tissue imaging and obtaining more abundant imaging information. Thus, nanobubbles are useful to evaluate the EPR effect. However, the clinical practicality of using ultrasound imaging with small-sized bubbles is considerably lower [133]. It is, therefore, important to maintain the imaging ability when the bubble size is reduced. One typical class of “small to large” bubbles are phase-inversion UCAs, as seen in Figure 4 [134, 135]. Nanoparticles or nanodroplets containing liquid fluorocarbons have been extensively explored and designed. The nanoscale and internal liquid environment promotes prolonged stability and tissue penetration. When the external temperature changes under the trigger of ultrasonic energy, the liquid fluorocarbon inside undergoes a liquid-to-gas phase transition and the volume increases accordingly, resulting in enhanced ultrasonic imaging at the lesion site. Finally, the bubble bursts, and the drug that is released in the target region may exert a further synergistic therapeutic effect. Min et al. developed tumor-homing echogenic chitosan-based nanoparticles, in which bioinert perfluoropentane (PFP) was encapsulated into glycol chitosan nanoparticles [136]. These particles showed prolonged echogenicity via the sustained microbubble formation process in the liquid-phase PFP at body temperature. A significant increase was found in the tumor-homing ability through the EPR effect of the nanoparticles, and this was used for cancer theranostics. Liu et al. prepared folic-acid-modified nanodroplets (FA-NDs) with phase-change ability, which undergo a liquid-gas phase transition under LIFU irradiation [137]. FA-NDs were found to be enriched in the tumor area under LIFU, and the resulting micron-sized MBs could enhance the ultrasound imaging signals.

 Figure 4 

The “small to large” strategy. Schematic of the method used to phase-change porphyrin nanodroplets into microbubbles, and the imaging contrast provided by both agents. Porphyrin nanodroplets, which provide photoacoustic contrast because of the strong optical absorption of porphyrin, can absorb acoustic or photonic energy which causes the liquid perfluorobutane core to phase-change into a gas microbubble, thereby providing ultrasound contrast due to its hyper-echogenic and nonlinear acoustic properties [135].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

The "big to small" strategy is mainly used to help microbubbles bypass the EPR effect and release drugs at the tumor site. Micro-sized bubbles are good angiographic contrast agents and drug carriers, but they cannot penetrate blood vessels to reach the tissues. If MBs can somehow be made smaller to become nanobubbles after reaching the tumor blood vessels and completing the imaging function, they could spread across the vascular barrier and into the tumor tissue to be used for further tissue imaging and drug release. Huynh et al. reported a method used for the conversion of microbubbles to nanoparticles using low-frequency ultrasound, as shown in Figure 5 [138]. Porphyrin loaded microbubbles can be used as tri-modality contrast agents for ultrasound, photoacoustic, and fluorescent imaging. During exposure to ultrasound, the microbubbles burst and formed smaller nanoparticles, which maintains the imaging and therapeutic properties and allows drug delivery to the tumor. With this conversion, microbubbles can potentially be used to bypass the EPR effect when delivering drugs to tumors.

Therefore, through the delicate design of the bubble structure and the appropriate introduction of external triggers, a new size-controllable theranostic agent with ultrasound enhancement effect and tissue penetration ability can be constructed to evaluate and enhance the EPR effect.

 Figure 5 

The "big to small" strategy. Schematics of porphyrin microbubbles (pMBs) and their micro-to-nano conversion. A. The pMBs consist of a BChl-lipid shell encapsulating perfluorocarbon gas. B. Conversion of pMBs to porphyrin nanoparticles (pNPs) via sonication with low-frequency, high-duty-cycle ultrasound (conversion ultrasound) [138].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)
 Figure 6 

In vivo US imaging. A US imaging and B the corresponding average gray values of VX2 tumors on rabbit livers before and after intravenous injection of SGC (SPIO@GCS/acryl/biotin-CAT/SOD-gel) at various times. C. Schematic mechanism of responsive bubble generation for US imaging. D. Yellow arrows indicate outlines of the VX2 tumors. The bars in A correspond to 0.5 cm. The standard deviation in B is derived from a group within the region of interest (ROI) (n = 3) [141].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

In situ generation

Different types of stimuli have been reported to trigger the in-situ generation of bubbles in a solid tumor. These types of stimuli are usually endogenous and are closely related to changes in the tumor microenvironment. Agents that are responsive to such stimuli are encapsulated in nanocarriers, which accumulate at the tumor site through the EPR effect. Stimuli are then applied, thus triggering the generation of gas free bubbles at the tumor tissue. The advantages of this in situ generation strategy are as follows: (1) The bubbles generated in situ at the tumor site do not need to be transported through blood. They can, therefore, avoid various biological barriers in the human body and can also bypass the requirement for EPR in changing the bubble size. (2) The generation of bubbles enhances the ultrasound imaging effect at the tumor site, which is conducive to diagnosis. If the generated gas can also be used for treatment, targeting, diagnosis, and treatment can be integrated.

For example, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is much higher in cancer tissues than in normal tissues. H2O2 is an ROS and a diagnostic marker in the development of certain diseases. Studies have found that Prussian blue nanoparticles have a catalase-like function in neutral environments, catalyzing H2O2 to produce oxygen [139]. When the oxygen generated exceeds the saturation concentration, it can form free oxygen bubbles, enhancing ultrasound imaging. Together with the MRI properties of Prussian blue nanoparticles, this could be used as an ultrasound/magnetic resonance bimodal imaging system which is triggered by the disease environment [140]. Similarly, Wang et al. [141] constructed a multifunctional carrier system loaded with two catalase enzymes and SPIO. The two enzymes catalyze the reaction of the ROS in the body under pathological conditions to produce oxygen that can be utilized for ultrasound imaging, as can be in Figure 6. The changes to the reaction environment also enhance the MRI capabilities of SPIO within the system.

Multi-gradient targeting

In the above studies, the aggregation of bubbles and release of drugs in the target region were mainly dependent on various exogenous and endogenous stimuli and were not caused by specific active targeting. EPR and the (over-) expression of angiogenesis-related surface receptors are key features of tumor blood vessels. As a consequence, EPR-mediated passive and ligand-based active targeting have attracted considerable attention. Kunjachan et al. visualized and quantified passive and active tumor targeting using RGD- and NGR-modified polymeric nanomedicines [142]. Wu et al. developed paclitaxel-loaded and A10-3.2 aptamer-targeted poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanobubbles, which can be aimed specifically at prostate cancer cells to sustainably release the loaded PTX via the EPR effect and US-triggered drug delivery [143]. Li et al. reported the use of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-mediated biodegradable photoluminescent nanobubbles as UCAs for targeted breast cancer imaging [144].

Rapid and efficient early binding of MNBs to the blood vessels of the tumor occurred through vascular targeting, but passive targeting was significantly more efficient over time. These results indicate that a combination of passive and active targeting is required for effective tumor imaging and therapy. Based on the above ideas, a multi-gradient targeting strategy has emerged. Multi-gradient targeting strategies refer to the further coupling of specific targeting factors on MNBs to combine active targeting with EPR-mediated passive targeting. When such MNBs are intravenously injected into the body, they become actively enriched in the tumor blood vessels under the action of specific targeting ligands, contributing to clearer ultrasound imaging. Following the application of an ultrasound field or various other internal and external sources of stimulation, the structure and/or the size of the MNBs changes. On the one hand, this change triggers various biological effects, which affect the permeability of the tumor blood vessels and enhance the EPR effect. On the other hand, the drug is released, forming a high drug concentration gradient in the microcirculation of the tumor tissue, efficiently allowing the drug to enter the tumor tissue for treatment by virtue of the EPR effect.

Several classes of ligands have been conjugated onto the surface of UCAs to achieve better targeting of tumor cells, including peptides, aptamers, and affibody molecules. These targeting ligands allow the UCAs to remain at a size at which the EPR effects can be exploited [145]. Cell membranes are a new type of shell material that have been used in the construction of bubbles. The inherent properties of natural lipids and protein components on a membrane can be used for natural targeting. For example, platelet membranes are rich in natural vessel adhesive components such as α2β1, α5β1, α6β1, and αbβ3, and the glycoproteins, GPIb-IX-V and GPV, which can naturally target injured vasculature [146]. Mingxi Li et al. used platelet membranes to fabricate bio-nanobubbles and demonstrated their lesion-targeting ability [147]. The abnormal vasculature within tumors provides the possibility of using bio-shelled bubbles for the targeting of tumors.

Active targeting can be performed by modifying bubble shells using a range of targeting ligands; such bubbles can therefore be applied in different types of cancer. There are several strategies that allow the binding of ligands to the bubble shell. First, avidin or streptavidin is commonly used for non-covalent attachment of biotinylated ligands onto the shell materials [148]. Yang et al. used the avidin-biotin method to combine NBs with biotinylated anti-ErbB2 Affibody® molecules [149]. The resulting NB-Affibody had a specific affinity for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-over-expressing tumors. Second, the covalent binding of ligands to the shell has also been explored. One approach involves the binding of activated carboxylic groups to shells with amino-groups from the lysine residues of binding ligands [145]. In a third approach, the ligands are coupled with the shell components (e.g., to phospholipids), followed by the formation of MBs. Chung-Hsin Wang et al. conjugated sgc8c aptamers to functional lipids and prepared DOX-loaded acoustic droplets [150]. The fully vaporized droplets resulted in the highest DOX uptake by cancer cells.

Multi-gradient targeting can be applied to both microscale and nanoscale bubbles. Nanoscale bubbles modified with targeting ligands are good carriers. Li et al. reported that the soft biodegradable glycine/PEG/RGD-modified poly (methacrylic acid) nanobubbles can be applied as intelligent theranostic vehicles for drug delivery [144]. Gao et al. developed the targeted ultrasound-triggered phase transition nanodroplets for Her2-overexpressing breast cancer diagnosis and gene transfection [151]. For micron-sized bubbles, Duan et al. [128] demonstrated a multi-gradient continuous targeting strategy based on the RGD-l-TRAIL-labeled magnetic microbubbles shown in Figure 7 for cancer therapy. The designed RGD-l-TRAIL@MMB system had a complex but elaborate multilayer structure: gas in the core for US imaging, SPIO on the shell for MRI imaging and magnetic targeting control, and RGD-l-TRAIL ligands for an enhanced combination of the tumor-targeted delivery of TRAIL. First, the RGD-l-TRAIL protein on the MMB surface enables the microbubbles to actively target angiogenesis of a tumor. The size of the micro-scaled bubbles around the tumor is beneficial for real-time US imaging and MRI to clearly delineate the tumor margin. Therefore, it is micron-scale targeting and diagnosis. Second, after US imaging, the microbubbles in situ around the tumor rupture and the nanoscale SPIOs with associated RGD-l-TRAIL molecules can travel through the blood vessels and enter the tumor tissue because of the tumor ligand induced integrin αvβ3-receptor-mediated endocytosis. At this stage, the tumor tissue can also be imaged using MRI. With the accumulation of RGD-l-TRAIL and SPIOs in the tumor tissue and cells, tumor apoptosis induced by TRAIL molecules can also be observed during this process; therefore, this process involves nanoscale targeting and diagnosis. The multi-gradient targeting drug delivery system has a reasonable structure, an adjustable drug dosage, and a clear target. It is a typical example of applying a multi-gradient targeting strategy for in vivo diagnosis and treatment.

Multi-field association

In addition to the ultrasound field, external factors including light, magnetic fields, radiation, and microwaves affect EPR. Internal factors such as pH, high concentrations of active oxygen, and various special cytokines are provided by the special pathological environment of the lesion. The mechanism by which each factor affects the EPR is different. Combining multiple energy fields can exert the combined effects of all of the different mechanisms to obtain an optimized and enhanced EPR effect.

 Figure 7 

Schematic diagram showing multi-gradient targeting strategy of RGD-l-TRAIL@MMBs for tumor diagnostics and therapy [128].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Local heating of the tumor site tends to increase the accumulation of nanomedicine, resulting in more effective intratumoral drug delivery. Hyperthermia enhances the increase in nano drug delivery within tumors because of the increased blood flow to the tumor caused by vasodilation. This increased vascular permeability is due to the increased intercellular space between endothelial cells [152-154]. Through the photothermal conversion effect, the irradiation of a tumor with a laser can also change the physiological state of the tumor and enhance the penetration of the nano drug into the tumor. By constructing a versatile theranostics carrier that responds to light and other external fields, thermal effects can be combined with other effects to improve vascular permeability. Ke et al. [155] constructed a multifunctional nanocapsule (NC) by loading perfluorooctylbromide (PFOB) and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles into poly(lactic acid) (PLA) NCs, followed by the formation of PEGylated gold nanoshells on the surface. Such a theranostic agent could efficiently kill tumor cells using NIR laser irradiation under the guidance of contrast-enhanced US/MRI to achieve great therapeutic effectiveness without systemic toxicity to the patient. Above all, the bimodal imaging guidance could display dynamic complementary information about a tumor to help alter the treatment on an individual basis with high efficiency.

The strategy of combining internal and external stimuli is also beneficial. Yang et al. [156, 157] constructed a composite microcapsule with internally encapsulated L-arginine, SPIO in the membrane shell, and glucose oxidase on the surface, which is a double-response, microcapsule transport system that reacts to both glucose and external magnetic fields, as shown in Figure 8. First, the glucose oxidase on the surface of the microcapsule specifically reacts with glucose in diabetic patients, reducing the glucose concentration and generating H2O2 and gluconic acid. The magnetic nanoparticles in the microcapsule shell then move under the action of the external magnetic field to generate gaps in the membrane, and the internally loaded L-arginine further reacts with the H2O2 to form NO. Therefore, it is apparent that through the dual response of the microcapsule structure to glucose and magnetic fields, high concentrations of glucose can be reduced and the generated NO gas can enhance the ultrasound imaging and the EPR effect, thus treating the disease. In addition to responding to external magnetic fields, the SPIO in the system also functions for MRI imaging. This system can be used as a multifunctional carrier platform for the effective regulation of blood glucose.

 Figure 8 

Schematic diagram of microvesicles encapsulated with magnetic nanoparticles and glucose oxidase for the dual-stimuli responsive programmable delivery model. The encapsulated glucose-specific enzyme catalyzes glucose into gluconic acid and H2O2. The subsequent alternating magnetic field increases the porosity of the polymer shell, leading to the reaction between L-arginine and H2O2 to produce nitric oxides [157].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)
 Figure 9 

Concepts and schematics of AMLs and their nano to micro conversion for US/MR dual modal imaging and the spatiotemporal-bombed combination tumor accurate therapy [129].

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Liu Yang et al. [129] designed a liposome drug delivery system, as seen in Figure 9, which is a complex structure of a therapeutic gas prodrug, anthranil trisulfide, and magnetic nanoparticles, which is efficiently concentrated at the targeted tumor site by the EPR effect under the control of an external magnetic field. Under the catalysis of biological enzymes such as CBS and CSE in the tumor, hydrogen sulfide is produced, which has antitumor properties. The liposome-loaded magnetic nanoparticles respond specifically to the external magnetic field. The intratumoral targeted aggregation of liposome can monitored and regulated by MRI; and the hydrogen sulfide microbubbles catalyzed by the enzyme enhance the intratumoral ultrasound contrast, leading to a greater intensity of ultrasound energy. The microbubble then ruptures, ultrasonic cavitation leads to physical tumor ablation, and the antitumor properties of the hydrogen sulfide itself lead to necrosis of the original dense intratumoral tissue, creating favorable conditions for the use of nanocarriers. This liposome drug system can achieve better theranostic destruction of a tumor under ultrasound/magnetic resonance bimodal image monitoring.

There are also multifunctional carrier systems with sophisticated designs that combine lasers, heat, radiation, and other external and ultrasonic fields to improve the permeability of tumor blood vessels and tissues and deliver drugs effectively.

The ideal process for tumor diagnosis and treatment based on the EPR effect is shown in Figure 10. Before starting treatment, an accurate individualized assessment of the EPR level should be performed for each individual patient, and different treatment options should be developed based on the results of the assessment. For patients with high EPR levels, an appropriate drug delivery system can be selected for treatment. For patients with low EPR levels, the EPR effect should be enhanced using various physical and pharmacological methods before treatment. Would it be possible to construct a multifunctional theranostics carrier that can play a role in all aspects of the evaluation, enhancement, and treatment, realizing the integration of EPR evaluation, enhancement, and EPR-based tumor treatments on a single platform? MNB-based drug delivery systems have become a potential choice because of their special properties such as imaging, drug release, changing structures, and production of various biological effects that can be mediated with ultrasound fields.

Around the process of tumor diagnosis and treatment and applying the four strategies mentioned, the potential of MNBs can be described in detail, as seen below in Figure 10. Firstly, MNBs can be used as contrast enhancers to visually and quantitatively evaluate the EPR levels of a patient. The accuracy of the assessment depends on two key processes: (1) Whether MNBs can efficiently reach tumor blood vessels through blood circulation, and (2) whether a strong echo signal can be generated after reaching the tumor site. The various strategies mentioned can have a positive effect on both of these processes. As described previously, the "small to large" size control strategy has been applied to construct small-sized nanodroplets that have higher stability in the blood circulation than MNBs. A multi-level targeting strategy can also be applied to couple the targeting factors on the surface of the nanodroplets to reach the tumor blood vessels more efficiently. In the latter process, through the mediation of an external energy field, the liquid droplets within the nano-droplet core can be transformed, thus increasing the volume to generate a stronger echo signal which is beneficial to ultrasound imaging. It is also possible to use the "in situ generation" strategy to generate bubbles in situ using the specific microenvironment of the tumor to create ultrasound contrast with which to evaluate the EPR.

Second, for patients with low EPR levels, MNBs can be combined with internal biochemical triggers and external energy fields to enhance the EPR effect using various strategies, as shown in Figure 10. For example, the "large to small" size control strategy facilitates the micron-sized bubbles to bypass the EPR effect and become smaller nanobubbles that can penetrate the vascular endothelial cell gap, allowing movement into the tumor tissue. The “multi-field association” strategy comprehensively uses light, heat, ultrasound, radiation, and various endogenous factors to increase vascular permeability and enhance the ability of the drug components carried by MNBs to spread out of the blood vessels. The “multi-gradient targeting” strategy allows the drug released after the rupture of a bubble to utilize molecular targeting to efficiently reach the tumor tissue through the blood vessel.

In addition, while enhancing the EPR effect, various energy fields can mediate the gradual disintegration of the structure of MNBs, releasing the various active substances the MNBs carry, including drugs, other nanoparticles, and therapeutic gases. These active substances are enriched in tumor tissues by the enhanced EPR effect and lead to further therapeutic or real-time imaging functions.

Summary and future perspectives

In the complex and variable micro-environment of a living organism, the key to effective treatment is drug components reaching a lesion efficiently and exerting continuous therapeutic effect. The nano carrier targeted drug delivery system, based on EPR, is one way to effectively improve the anticancer effect of drugs. In recent decades, various forms of multifunctional carrier materials such as liposomes, MNBs, micelles, nanoemulsions, magnetic nanoparticles, polymer nanoparticles, and dendrimers have been designed and developed to improve the aggregation and permeability of the drug at the tumor site. In this review, we focused on the effects of ultrasound and MNBs on EPR, discussed in detail the potential mechanisms by which their respective roles and synergies affect EPR, and illustrated new strategies that have been developed to enhance EPR. Although these new strategies do show promise, further research is needed in this area to demonstrate effective drug delivery and therapeutic effects. In this study, we discuss the advantages of MNB-assisted ultrasound to enhance the EPR effect, the current problems, and any possible countermeasures.

 Figure 10 

Ideal process for tumor diagnosis and treatment based on the EPR effect by ultrasound and its contrast agents.

Theranostics Image (Click on the image to enlarge.)

Advantages

MNBs are distinctly distinguished from other carrier materials in that they have multiple forms of response to the ultrasound field, and the rich biological effects of these responses have a potential role in both EPR imaging and enhancement processes. Under ultrasound energy mediation, the MNB theranostic carrier can affect the EPR in combination with various favorable conditions. First, ultrasound and MNBs can both affect the EPR. The ultrasonic streaming and hyperthermia effect from the ultrasound itself can improve the ability of a drug to diffuse into a tissue, promote the extravasation of drugs, and enhance the permeability of blood vessels. MNBs can also be used as drug carriers with certain EPR effects using various strategies such as structural design, size control, and modification of the membrane shell. Second, ultrasound can be used to further assist MNBs, which are imaged by low-intensity ultrasound energy to evaluate EPR. MNBs can also rupture under high-intensity ultrasound energy and produce biological effects such as cavitation, which leads to the more efficient transport of a drug into the tumor tissue through the vascular endothelial cells. Through sophisticated design, the internal and external source energy fields can be combined, making full use of “adjustable size modulation”, “in situ generation”, “multi-gradient targeting”, and “multi-field association” strategies, which can further improve the penetration ability and delivery efficiency of drugs at the tumor site.

Challenges and countermeasures

5.2.1 Size barrier

The size of the MNBs is still a barrier to the EPR effect. The efficacy of a diagnostic and therapeutic agent through the EPR effect is size-dependent. Related research has shown that liposomes with a hydrodynamic particle size between 100 and 200 nm showed a 4-fold higher accumulation in tumors than liposomes with a particle size of less than 50 nm and above 300 nm [158]. The preparation of nanobubbles with a size of less than 200 nm remains challenging. Although studies have shown that ultrasound can rupture lipid microbubbles in the body and form smaller nanoparticles with the same optical properties as the original microbubbles, meaning that micron-sized bubbles can bypass the EPR effect when delivering drugs to the tumor, there is still a need to develop small-sized nanobubbles with the ability of enhanced accumulation. Therefore, it is critical that new preparation processes are developed, and that various adverse problems such as the weak imaging effects caused by small-sized nanobubbles and the decreased drug-loading capacity are dealt with. The combination of NBs with other nanocarriers is one possible way to increase the efficiency of these bubbles in terms of drug delivery.

Structural complexity

Multi-modal imaging, in which targeting factors are coupled with the response to various energy fields and other functions, makes the structure of MNBs complex, thus increasing the difficulty in constructing carriers. Therefore, it is necessary to further study and optimize the preparation method of MNBs theranostics carriers, improve the fineness, controllability, and repeatability, and finally to achieve standardization. It is also necessary to further study the effects of MNB carrier structures on their function, such as the material from which membrane shells are built, size, drug-loading mode, and the effects of target type on imaging and targeting. In addition, in the complex and variable microenvironment of the body, it is very challenging to simultaneously achieve a targeted system with high diagnostic sensitivity, high specificity, and good therapeutic effect. The more complex a structure is, the more risk there is, so it is difficult to anticipate the realization of a function and to achieve clinical transformation, especially when using relatively large targeting systems (hundred nanometers and above) such as MNBs. The sensitivity of different biological tissues to ultrasound is quite different, so the applied ultrasound parameters will need to be changed accordingly. The ultrasound parameters used to stimulate the MNBs would also need to be adjusted for use with the different kinds of bubbles.

More in vivo experiments are needed to clarify the toxicity, distribution, and pharmacokinetics of a carrier within the body and to provide abundant evidence for clinical application. It is foreseeable that with the continuous development of biomedical nanotechnology based on ultrasound and MNBs, more innovative and more powerful theranostics carriers will be designed and developed to further promote tumor-targeted therapy.

Potential safety concerns

One of the important principles of drug delivery system development is safety. The safety issues for micro/nano-bubble-assisted ultrasound to enhance EPR effects, such as micro/nano-bubble toxicity [159-161] and damage to vessels through acoustic energy still need to be fully investigated on priority for future clinical applications [162, 163]. The safety issues related to ultrasound have been addressed in Section 2 of this review. The biodegradability and metabolites of ultrasound contrast agents should be investigated. Although some studies have investigated the short-time toxicity, safety tests for biocompatibility, acute toxicity, subacute toxicity, carcinogenicity, developmental toxicity, immunotoxicology, genotoxicity, and irritation to blood vessel should be conducted in the future, especially when MNBs are coupled with ultrasound energy.

Abbreviations

EPR: permeability and retention; UCA: Ultrasound contrast agent; TI: thermal index; MI: mechanical index; FDA: Drug Administration; PnP: negative pressure; CW: continuous wave; DOX: Doxorubicin; GNPs: gold nanoparticles; DDS: drug delivery system; PIV: particle image velocimetry; SC: stable cavitation; IC: inertial cavitation; SEM: scanning electron microscopy; AFM: atomic force microscopy; TMC: Transmembrane current; CAD: computer-aided detection; UOM: ultrasound-modulated optical microscopy; CEUS: contrast-enhanced US; IVUS: intravascular ultrasound; BFR: blood flow resistance; MNBs: micro/ nanobubbles; UCAs: ultrasound contrast agents; PLGA: poly-(lactic-co-glycolic acid); rBV: relative blood volume; BBB: blood-brain barrier; B-MB: boron-polymer/microbubble complex; FUS: focused ultrasound; LIFU: low-intensity focused ultrasound; NPs: nanoparticles; RES: reticuloendothelial system; PFP: perfluoropentane; FA-NDs: folic-acid-modified nanodroplets; pMBs: porphyrin microbubbles; pNPs: porphyrin nanoparticles; ROS: reactive oxygen species; PFOB: perfluorooctylbromide; PLA: poly(lactic acid); NCs: nanocapsules; PSV: peak systolic velocity; SGC: SPIO@GCS/acryl/biotin-CAT/SOD-gel; PFC: perfluocarbon; AML: the anethole dithiolethiones (ADT)-loaded magnetic nanoliposomes; CBS: cystathionine-β synthase; CSE: cystathionine-γ-lyase; MMB: magnetic microbubbles

Acknowledgements

This investigation was financially funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0104302, 2018YFA0704103), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51832001, 61821002, 81701833 and 81971750), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191266), and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (1808085QH233). Funding also partially comes from the Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province (2017-SWYY-006) and Zhong Ying Young Scholar of Southeast University. The authors also would like to thank the support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Papetti M, Herman IM. Mechanisms of normal and tumor-derived angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;282:C947-C70

2. Ziyad S, Iruela-Arispe ML. Molecular mechanisms of tumor angiogenesis. Genes & cancer. 2011;2:1085-96

3. Fukumura D, Duda DG, Munn LL, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: novel insights through intravital imaging in pre-clinical models. Microcirculation. 2010;17:206-25

4. Nakamura Y, Mochida A, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Nanodrug delivery: is the enhanced permeability and retention effect sufficient for curing cancer?. Bioconjug Chem. 2016;27:2225-38

5. Kobayashi H, Turkbey B, Watanabe R, Choyke PL. Cancer drug delivery: considerations in the rational design of nanosized bioconjugates. Bioconjug Chem. 2014;25:2093-100

6. Tosetti F, Ferrari N, De Flora S, Albini A. 'Angioprevention': angiogenesis is a common and key target for cancer chemopreventive agents. FASEB J. 2002;16:2-14

7. Torchilin V. Tumor delivery of macromolecular drugs based on the EPR effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:131-5

8. Prabhakar U, Maeda H, Jain RK, Sevick-Muraca EM, Zamboni W, Farokhzad OC. et al. Challenges and key considerations of the enhanced permeability and retention effect for nanomedicine drug delivery in oncology. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2412-7

9. Maeda H, Nakamura H, Fang J. The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:71-9

10. Jain RK, Stylianopoulos T. Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:653-64

11. Lammers T, Kiessling F, Hennink WE, Storm G. Drug targeting to tumors: principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress. J Control Release. 2012;161:175-87

12. Taurin S, Nehoff H, Greish K. Anticancer nanomedicine and tumor vascular permeability; Where is the missing link?. J Control Release. 2012;164:265-75

13. Kwon IK, Lee SC, Han B, Park K. Analysis on the current status of targeted drug delivery to tumors. J Control Release. 2012;164:108-14

14. Bae YH, Park K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. J Control Release. 2011;153:198-205

15. Maeda H, Khatami M. Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs. Clin Transl Med. 2018;7:11

16. Harrington KJ, Mohammadtaghi S, Uster PS, Glass D, Peters AM, Vile RG. et al. Effective targeting of solid tumors in patients with locally advanced cancers by radiolabeled pegylated liposomes. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:243-54

17. Tanaka N, Kanatani S, Tomer R, Sahlgren C, Kronqvist P, Kaczynska D. et al. Whole-tissue biopsy phenotyping of three-dimensional tumours reveals patterns of cancer heterogeneity. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:796-806

18. Kalyane D, Raval N, Maheshwari R, Tambe V, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Employment of enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR): nanoparticle-based precision tools for targeting of therapeutic and diagnostic agent in cancer. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;98:1252-76

19. Lammers T. Smart drug delivery systems: back to the future vs. clinical reality. Int J Pharm. 2013;454:527-9

20. Chauhan VP, Stylianopoulos T, Martin JD, Popovic Z, Chen O, Kamoun WS. et al. Normalization of tumour blood vessels improves the delivery of nanomedicines in a size-dependent manner. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:383-8

21. Mitragotri S, Lahann J. Physical approaches to biomaterial design. Nat Mater. 2009;8:15-23

22. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:417-27

23. Kotopoulis S, Dimcevski G, Gilja OH, Hoem D, Postema M. Treatment of human pancreatic cancer using combined ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine: a clinical case study. Med Phys. 2013;40:072902

24. Dimcevski G, Kotopoulis S, Bjanes T, Hoem D, Schjott J, Gjertsen BT. et al. A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. J Control Release. 2016;243:172-81

25. Nofiele JIT, Karshafian R, Furukawa M, Al Mahrouki A, Giles A, Wong S. et al. Ultrasound-activated microbubble cancer therapy: ceramide production leading to enhanced radiation effect in vitro. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013;12:53-60

26. Kim J, Cho HR, Jeon H, Kim D, Song C, Lee N. et al. Continuous O2-evolving MnFe2O4 nanoparticle-anchored mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient photodynamic therapy in hypoxic cancer. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:10992-5

27. Chen L, Zang F, Wu H, Li J, Xie J, Ma M. et al. Using PEGylated magnetic nanoparticles to describe the EPR effect in tumor for predicting therapeutic efficacy of micelle drugs. Nanoscale. 2018;10:1788-97

28. Theek B, Gremse F, Kunjachan S, Fokong S, Pola R, Pechar M. et al. Characterizing EPR-mediated passive drug targeting using contrast-enhanced functional ultrasound imaging. J Control Release. 2014;182:83-9

29. Ehling J, Theek B, Gremse F, Baetke S, Moeckel D, Maynard J. et al. Micro-CT imaging of tumor angiogenesis quantitative measures describing micromorphology and vascularization. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:431-41

30. Karageorgis A, Dufort S, Sancey L, Henry M, Hirsjaervi S, Passirani C. et al. An MRI-based classification scheme to predict passive access of 5 to 50-nm large nanoparticles to tumors. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21417

31. Sulheim E, Kim J, van Wamel A, Kim E, Snipstad S, Vidic I. et al. Multi-modal characterization of vasculature and nanoparticle accumulation in five tumor xenograft models. J Control Release. 2018;279:292-305

32. Sano K, Nakajima T, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. The effect of photoimmunotherapy followed by liposomal daunorubicin in a mixed tumor model: a demonstration of the super-enhanced permeability and retention effect after photoimmunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13:426-32

33. Sano K, Nakajima T, Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Markedly enhanced permeability and retention effects induced by photo-immunotherapy of tumors. ACS Nano. 2013;7:717-24

34. Chen B, Pogue BW, Luna JM, Hardman RL, Hoopes PJ, Hasan T. Tumor vascular permeabilization by vascular-targeting photosensitization: effects, mechanism, and therapeutic implications. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:917-23

35. Kong G, Braun RD, Dewhirst MW. Characterization of the effect of hyperthermia on nanoparticle extravasation from tumor vasculature. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3027-32

36. Dewey WC, Thrall DE, Gillette EL. Hyperthermia and radiation - selective thermal effect on chronically hypoxic tumor-cells invivo. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1977;2:99-103

37. Burd R, Dziedzic TS, Xu Y, Caligiuri MA, Subjeck JR, Repasky EA. Tumor cell apoptosis, lymphocyte recruitment and tumor vascular changes are induced by low temperature, long duration (fever-like) whole body hyperthermia. J Cell Physiol. 1998;177:137-47

38. Theek B, Baues M, Ojha T, Moeckel D, Veettil SK, Steitz J. et al. Sonoporation enhances liposome accumulation and penetration in tumors with low EPR. J Control Release. 2016;231:77-85

39. Grainger SJ, Serna JV, Sunny S, Zhou Y, Deng CX, El-Sayed MEH. Pulsed ultrasound enhances nanoparticle penetration into breast cancer spheroids. Mol Pharm. 2010;7:2006-19

40. Carlisle R, Choi J, Bazan-Peregrino M, Laga R, Subr V, Kostka L. et al. Enhanced tumor uptake and penetration of virotherapy using polymer stealthing and focused ultrasound. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1701-10

41. Wang S, Shin IS, Hancock H, Jang B-s, Kim H-s, Lee SM. et al. Pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound increases penetration and therapeutic efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in murine xenograft tumors. J Control Release. 2012;162:218-24

42. Lammers T, Subr V, Peschke P, Kuehnlein P, Hennink WE, Ulbrich K. et al. Image-guided and passively tumour-targeted polymeric nanomedicines for radiochemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:900-10

43. Mi Y, Shao Z, Vang J, Kaidar-Person O, Wang AZ. Application of nanotechnology to cancer radiotherapy. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2016;7:11

44. Xing H, Hwang K, Lu Y. Recent developments of liposomes as nanocarriers for theranostic applications. Theranostics. 2016;6:1336-52

45. Yu B, Goel S, Ni D, Ellison PA, Siamof CM, Jiang D. et al. Reassembly of Zr-89-labeled cancer cell membranes into multicompartment membrane-derived liposomes for PET-trackable tumor-targeted theranostics. Adv Mater. 2018;30:e1704934

46. Hansen AE, Petersen AL, Henriksen JR, Boerresen B, Rasmussen P, Elema DR. et al. Positron emission tomography based elucidation of the enhanced permeability and retention effect in dogs with cancer using Copper-64 liposomes. ACS Nano. 2015;9:6985-95

47. Johnstone TC, Kulak N, Pridgen EM, Farokhzad OC, Langer R, Lippard SJ. Nanoparticle encapsulation of mitaplatin and the effect thereof on in vivo properties. ACS Nano. 2013;7:5675-83

48. Cho H, Kwon GS. Polymeric micelles for neoadjuvant cancer therapy and tumor-primed optical imaging. ACS Nano. 2011;5:8721-9

49. Kim YS, Rhim H, Choi MJ, Lim HK, Choi D. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy: an overview for radiologists. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:291-302

50. Dalecki D. Mechanical bioeffects of ultrasound. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:229-48

51. Sirsi SR, Borden MA. State-of-the-art materials for ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:3-14

52. Husseini GA, Myrup GD, Pitt WG, Christensen DA, Rapoport NAY. Factors affecting acoustically triggered release of drugs from polymeric micelles. J Control Release. 2000;69:43-52

53. Ahmed SE, Moussa HG, Martins AM, Abbas Y, Al-Sayah MH, Husseini GA. Factors affecting the acoustic in vitro release of calcein from pegylated liposomes. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019;19:6899-906

54. Alexander Marin MM, Natalya Rapoport. Acoustic activation of drug delivery from polymeric micelles: effect of pulsed ultrasound. J Control Release. 2001;71:239-249

55. Alexandre Marin HS, Ghaleb A. Husseini, William G. Pitt, Douglas A. Christensen NYRaa. Drug delivery in pluronic micelles: effect of high-frequency ultrasound on drug release from micelles and intracellular uptake. J Control Release. 2002;84:39-47

56. Liu T, Li M, Tang J, Li J, Zhou Y, Liu Y. et al. An acoustic strategy for gold nanoparticle loading in platelets as biomimetic multifunctional carriers. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:2138-44

57. Li Y, Qiu C, Xu S, Ke M, Liu Z. Theoretical study of large-angle bending transport of microparticles by 2D acoustic half-bessel beams. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13063

58. Crum LA. Bjerknes forces on bubbles in a stationary sound field. J Acoust Soc Am. 1975;57:1363-70

59. Mettin R, Akhatov I, Parlitz U, Ohl CD, Lauterborn W. Bjerknes forces between small cavitation bubbles in a strong acoustic held. Phys Rev E. 1997;56:2924-31

60. Dayton P, Klibanov A, Brandenburger G, Ferrara K. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25:1195-201

61. Wang S, Wang CY, Unnikrishnan S, Klibanov AL, Hossack JA, Mauldin FW. Optical verification of microbubble response to acoustic radiation force in large vessels with in vivo results. Invest Radiol. 2015;50:772-84

62. Kilroy JP, Klibanov AL, Wamhoff BR, Hossack JA. Intravascular ultrasound catheter to enhance microbubble-based drug delivery via acoustic radiation force. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012;59:2156-66

63. Shi XG, Martin RW, Vaezy S, Crum LA. Quantitative investigation of acoustic streaming in blood. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111:1110-21

64. Solovchuk MA, Thiriet M, Sheu TWH. Computational study of acoustic streaming and heating during acoustic hemostasis. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;124:1112-22

65. Rapoport N. Ultrasound-mediated micellar drug delivery. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28:374-85

66. Peng H, Zhu P, Lu P. Acoustic streaming simulation and analyses in in vitro low frequency sonophoresis. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2017;263:744-53

67. Cho E, Chung SK, Rhee K. Streaming flow from ultrasound contrast agents by acoustic waves in a blood vessel model. Ultrasonics. 2015;62:66-74

68. Leighton TG. The acoustic bubble. London: Academic Press. 1994

69. Coussios CC, Roy RA. Applications of acoustics and cavitation to noninvasive therapy and drug delivery. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2008;40:395-420

70. Sankin GN, Simmons WN, Zhu SL, Zhong P. Shock wave interaction with laser-generated single bubbles. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95:034501

71. Chen H, Kreider W, Brayman AA, Bailey MR, Matula TJ. Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:034301

72. Bang JH, Suslick KS. Applications of ultrasound to the synthesis of nanostructured materials. Adv Mater. 2010;22:1039-59

73. Rivas DF, Prosperetti A, Zijlstra AG, Lohse D, Gardeniers HJGE. Efficient sonochemistry through microbubbles generated with micromachined surfaces. Angew Chem. 2010;49:9699-701

74. Kwan JJ, Graham S, Myers R, Carlisle R, Stride E, Coussios CC. Ultrasound-induced inertial cavitation from gas-stabilizing nanoparticles. Phys Rev E. 2015;92:023019

75. Marmottant P, van der Meer S, Emmer M, Versluis M, de Jong N, Hilgenfeldt S. et al. A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:3499-505

76. Radhakrishnan K, Haworth KJ, Peng T, McPherson DD, Holland CK. Loss of echogenicity and onset of cavitation from echogenic liposomes: pulse repetition frequency independence. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:208-21

77. Pouliopoulos AN, Bonaccorsi S, Choi JJ. Exploiting flow to control the in vitro spatiotemporal distribution of microbubble-seeded acoustic cavitation activity in ultrasound therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:6941-57

78. Lo CW, Desjouy C, Chen SR, Lee JL, Inserra C, Bera JC. et al. Stabilizing in vitro ultrasound-mediated gene transfection by regulating cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem. 2014;21:833-9

79. Guevener N, Appold L, de Lorenzi F, Golombek SK, Rizzo LY, Lammers T. et al. Recent advances in ultrasound-based diagnosis and therapy with micro- and nanometer-sized formulations. Methods. 2017;130:4-13

80. Fan P, Zhang Y, Guo X, Cai C, Wang M, Yang D. et al. Cell-cycle-specific cellular responses to sonoporation. Theranostics. 2017;7:4894-908

81. Marmottant P, Hilgenfeldt S. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature. 2003;423:153-6

82. Mehier Humbert S, Bettinger T, Yan F, Guy RH. Plasma membrane poration induced by ultrasound exposure: implication for drug delivery. J Control Release; 104: 213-22.

83. Ross JP, Cai X, Chiu JF, Yang J, Wu JR. Optical and atomic force microscopic studies on sonoporation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111:1161-4

84. Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:915-24

85. Zhao YZ, Luo YK, Lu CT, Xu JF, Tang J, Zhang M. et al. Phospholipids-based microbubbles sonoporation pore size and reseal of cell membrane cultured in vitro. J Drug Target. 2008;16:18-25

86. Zhou Y, Kumon RE, Cui J, Deng CX. The size of sonoporation pores on the cell membrane. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1756-60

87. Stanley B. Barnett HDD, Gail R. Ter Haar, i, Marvin C. Ziskin aKM. The sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23:805-812

88. Lammertink BH, Bos C, Deckers R, Storm G, Moonen CT, Escoffre JM. Sonochemotherapy: from bench to bedside. Front Pharmacol. 2015;6:138

89. Needham D, Anyarambhatla G, Kong G, Dewhirst MW. A new temperature-sensitive liposome for use with mild hyperthermia: characterization and testing in a human tumor xenograft model. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1197-201

90. Shimizu K, Tsuchiya T, Fukasawa K, Hatano Y, Endoh N. Analysis of cooling effect by blood vessel on temperature rise due to ultrasound radiation in tissue phantom. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2015;54:07HF22

91. Tan Q, Zou X, Dong H, Ding Y, Zhao X. Influence of blood vessels on temperature during high-intensity focused ultrasound hyperthermia based on the thermal wave model of bioheat transfer. Adv Condens Matter Phys. 2018;4:1-10

92. Kabalnov A, Klein D, Pelura T, Schutt E, Weers J. Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:739-49

93. Kabalnov A, Bradley J, Flaim S, Klein D, Pelura T, Peters B. et al. Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:751-60

94. Huang SL, Kee PH, Kim H, Moody MR, Chrzanowski SM, MacDonald RC. et al. Nitric oxide-loaded echogenic liposomes for nitric oxide delivery and inhibition of intimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:652-9

95. Cavalieri F, Finelli I, Tortora M, Mozetic P, Chiessi E, Polizio F. et al. Polymer microbubbles as diagnostic and therapeutic gas delivery device. Chem Mater. 2008;20:3254-8

96. Cavalli R, Bisazza A, Rolfo A, Balbis S, Madonnaripa D, Caniggia I. et al. Ultrasound-mediated oxygen delivery from chitosan nanobubbles. Int J Pharm. 2009;378:215-7

97. Eisenbrey JR, Albala L, Kramer MR, Daroshefski N, Brown D, Liu JB. et al. Development of an ultrasound sensitive oxygen carrier for oxygen delivery to hypoxic tissue. Int J Pharm. 2015;478:361-7

98. Pellow C, Acconcia C, Zheng G, Goertz DE. Threshold-dependent nonlinear scattering from porphyrin nanobubbles for vascular and extravascular applications. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:215001

99. Yin T, Wang P, Zheng R, Zheng B, Cheng D, Zhang X. et al. Nanobubbles for enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumors. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:895-904

100. Ferrara KW, Borden MA, Zhang H. Lipid-shelled vehicles: engineering for ultrasound molecular imaging and drug delivery. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:881-92

101. Maeda H, Bharate GY, Daruwalla J. Polymeric drugs for efficient tumor-targeted drug delivery based on EPR-effect. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71:409-19

102. Cavalli R, Argenziano M, Vigna E, Giustetto P, Torres E, Aime S. et al. Preparation and in vitro characterization of chitosan nanobubbles as theranostic agents. Colloids Surf B. 2015;129:39-46

103. Hauser J, Ellisman M, Steinau H-U, Stefan E, Dudda M, Hauser M. Ultrasound enhanced endocytotic activity of human fibroblasts. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:2084-92

104. Meijering BDM, Juffermans LJM, van Wamel A, Henning RH, Zuhorn IS, Emmer M. et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-targeted delivery of macromolecules is regulated by induction of endocytosis and pore formation. Circ Res. 2009;104:679-U226

105. Caskey CF, Stieger SM, Qin S, Dayton PA, Ferrara KW. Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122:1191-200

106. Dayton PA, Allen JS, Ferrara KW. The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:2183-92

107. Tran TA, Roger S, Le Guennec JY, Tranquart F, Bouakaz A. Effect of ultrasound-activated microbubbles on the cell electrophysiological properties. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:158-63

108. Hassan MA, Campbell P, Kondo T. The role of Ca2+ in ultrasound-elicited bioeffects: progress, perspectives and prospects. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15:892-906

109. Zhou Y, Yang K, Cui J, Ye JY, Deng CX. Controlled permeation of cell membrane by single bubble acoustic cavitation. J Control Release. 2012;157:103-11

110. Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F. Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian-tissues. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64:423-57

111. Frenkel V. Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60:1193-208

112. Yang F, Gu N, Chen D, Xi X, Zhang D, Li Y. et al. Experimental study on cell self-sealing during sonoporation. J Control Release. 2008;131:205-10

113. van Wamel A, Kooiman K, Harteveld M, Emmer M, ten Cate FJ, Versluis M. et al. Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: Drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. J Control Release. 2006;112:149-55

114. Crouzet S, Chapelon JY, Rouviere O, Mege-Lechevallier F, Colombel M, Tonoli-Catez H. et al. Whole-gland ablation of localized prostate cancer with high-intensity focused ultrasound: oncologic outcomes and morbidity in 1002 patients. Eur Urol. 2014;65:907-14

115. You DG, Yoon HY, Jeon S, Um W, Son S, Park JH. et al. Deep tissue penetration of nanoparticles using pulsed-high intensity focused ultrasound. Nano Converg. 2017;4:30

116. Li X, Xin H, Yang S, Zhao M, Wang X, Zhang N. Breast osteoblastoma and recurrence after resection: Demonstration by color Doppler ultrasound. J Xray Sci Technol. 2017;25:787-91

117. Brismar TB, Grishenkov D, Gustafsson B, Harmark J, Barrefelt A, Kothapalli SVVN. et al. Magnetite nanoparticles can be coupled to microbubbles to support multimodal imaging. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13:1390-9

118. Poehlmann M, Grishenkov D, Kothapalli SVVN, Harmark J, Hebert H, Philipp A. et al. On the interplay of shell structure with low- and high-frequency mechanics of multifunctional magnetic microbubbles. Soft Matter. 2014;10:214-26

119. Leong-Poi H, Christiansen J, Klibanov AL, Kaul S, Lindner JR. Noninvasive assessment of angiogenesis by ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)-integrins. Circulation. 2003;107:455-60

120. Rapoport N, Gao Z, Kennedy A. Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1095-106

121. Kooiman K, Vos HJ, Versluis M, de Jong N. Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;72:28-48

122. Khokhlova TD, Haider Y, Hwang JH. Therapeutic potential of ultrasound microbubbles in gastrointestinal oncology: recent advances and future prospects. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2015;8:384-94

123. Fan CH, Wang TW, Hsieh YK, Wang CF, Gao Z, Kim A. et al. Enhancing boron uptake in brain glioma by a boron-polymer/microbubble complex with focused ultrasound. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:11157-11166

124. Cao Y, Chen Y, Yu T, Guo Y, Liu F, Yao Y. et al. Drug release from phase-changeable nanodroplets triggered by low-intensity focused ultrasound. Theranostics. 2018;8:1327-1339

125. Dimcevski G, Kotopoulis S, Bjånes T, Hoem D, Schjøtt J, Gjertsen BT. et al. A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. J Control Release. 2016;243:172-81

126. Lajos P Balogh. Nanomedicine in Cancer. Pan Stanford Publishing. 2017

127. Bertrand N, Wu J, Xu X, Kamaly N, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;66:2-25

128. Duan L, Yang F, He W, Song L, Qiu F, Xu N. et al. A multi-gradient targeting drug delivery system based on RGD-L-TRAIL-labeled magnetic microbubbles for cancer theranostics. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:8313-24

129. Liu Y, Yang F, Yuan C, Li M, Wang T, Chen B. et al. Magnetic nanoliposomes as in situ microbubble bombers for multimodality image-guided cancer theranostics. ACS nano. 2017;11:1509-19

130. Fix SM, Borden MA, Dayton PA. Therapeutic gas delivery via microbubbles and liposomes. J Control Release. 2015;209:139-49

131. Vaupel P, Höckel M, Mayer A. Detection and characterization of tumor hypoxia using pO2 histography. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:1221-36

132. Mocellin S, Bronte V, Nitti D. Nitric oxide, a double edged sword in cancer biology: searching for therapeutic opportunities. Med Res Rev. 2007;27:317-52

133. Son S, Min HS, You DG, Kim BS, Kwon IC. Echogenic nanoparticles for ultrasound technologies: Evolution from diagnostic imaging modality to multimodal theranostic agent. Nano Today. 2014;9:525-40

134. Lee JY, Carugo D, Crake C, Owen J, de St Victor M, Seth A. et al. Nanoparticle-loaded protein-polymer nanodroplets for improved stability and conversion efficiency in ultrasound imaging and drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2015;27:5484-92

135. Paproski RJ, Forbrich A, Huynh E, Chen J, Lewis JD, Zheng G. et al. Porphyrin nanodroplets: sub-micrometer ultrasound and photoacoustic contrast imaging agents. Small. 2016;12:371-80

136. Min HS, You DG, Son S, Jeon S, Park JH, Lee S. et al. Echogenic glycol chitosan nanoparticles for ultrasound-triggered cancer theranostics. Theranostics. 2015;5:1402-1418

137. Liu J, Shang T, Wang F, Cao Y, Hao L, Ren J. et al. Low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU)-induced acoustic droplet vaporization in phase-transition perfluoropentane nanodroplets modified by folate for ultrasound molecular imaging. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:911-923

138. Huynh E, Leung BY, Helfield BL, Shakiba M, Gandier J-A, Jin CS. et al. In situ conversion of porphyrin microbubbles to nanoparticles for multimodality imaging. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:325

139. Zhang W, Hu S, Yin JJ, He W, Lu W, Ma M. et al. Prussian blue nanoparticles as multienzyme mimetics and reactive oxygen species scavengers. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:5860-5

140. Yang F, Hu S, Zhang Y, Cai X, Huang Y, Wang F. et al. A hydrogen peroxide-responsive O2 nanogenerator for ultrasound and magnetic-resonance dual modality imaging. Adv Mater. 2012;24:5205-11

141. Wang X, Niu D, Li P, Wu Q, Bo X, Liu B. et al. Dual-enzyme-loaded multifunctional hybrid nanogel system for pathological responsive ultrasound imaging and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Nano. 2015;9:5646-56

142. Kunjachan S, Pola R, Gremse F, Theek B, Ehling J, Moeckel D. et al. Passive versus active tumor targeting using RGD-and NGR-modified polymeric nanomedicines. Nano Lett. 2014;14:972-81

143. Wu M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhang M, Luo Y, Tang J. et al. Paclitaxel-loaded and A10-3.2 aptamer-targeted poly (lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanobubbles for ultrasound imaging and therapy of prostate cancer. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:5313-5330

144. Li Y, Wan J, Zhang Z, Guo J, Wang C. Targeted soft biodegradable glycine/PEG/RGD-modified poly (methacrylic acid) nanobubbles as intelligent theranostic vehicles for drug delivery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:35604-12

145. Shi D, Guo L, Duan S, Shang M, Meng D, Cheng L. et al. Influence of tumor cell lines derived from different tissue on sonoporation efficiency under ultrasound microbubble treatment. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017;38:598-603

146. Ruggeri ZM. Platelets in atherothrombosis. Nat Med. 2002;8:1227

147. Li M, Liu Y, Chen J, Liu T, Gu Z, Zhang J. et al. Platelet bio-nanobubbles as microvascular recanalization nanoformulation for acute ischemic stroke lesion theranostics. Theranostics. 2018;8:4870-4883

148. Klibanov AL. Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2005;16:9-17

149. Yang H, Cai W, Xu L, Lv X, Qiao Y, Li P. et al. Nanobubble-affibody: novel ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular ultrasound imaging of tumor. Biomaterials. 2015;37:279-88

150. Wang CH, Kang ST, Lee YH, Luo YL, Huang YF, Yeh CK. Aptamer-conjugated and drug-loaded acoustic droplets for ultrasound theranosis. Biomaterials. 2012;33:1939-47

151. Gao D, Gao J, Xu M, Cao Z, Zhou L, Li Y. et al. Targeted ultrasound-triggered phase transition nanodroplets for Her2-overexpressing breast cancer diagnosis and gene transfection. Mol Pharm. 2017;14:984-98

152. Dudar TE, Jain RK. Differential response of normal and tumor microcirculation to hyperthermia. Cancer Res. 1984;44:605-12

153. Kong G, Braun RD, Dewhirst MW. Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: Effect of particle size. Cancer Res. 2000;60:4440-5

154. Chen BG, Zhou MJ, Xu LX. Study of vascular endothelial cell morphology during hyperthermia. J Therm Biol. 2005;30:111-7

155. Ke H, Wang J, Tong S, Jin Y, Wang S, Qu E. et al. Gold nanoshelled liquid perfluorocarbon magnetic nanocapsules: a nanotheranostic platform for bimodal ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging guided photothermal tumor ablation. Theranostics. 2014;4:12-23

156. Yang F, Chen P, He W, Gu N, Zhang X, Fang K. et al. Bubble microreactors triggered by an alternating magnetic field as diagnostic and therapeutic delivery devices. Small. 2010;6:1300-5

157. Yang F, Li M, Liu Y, Wang T, Feng Z, Cui H. et al. Glucose and magnetic-responsive approach toward in situ nitric oxide bubbles controlled generation for hyperglycemia theranostics. J Control Release. 2016;228:87-95

158. Charrois GJR, Allen TM. Drug release rate influences the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, therapeutic activity, and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin formulations in murine breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2004;1663:167-77

159. Unga J, Kageyama S, Suzuki R, Omata D, Maruyama K. Scale-up production, characterization and toxicity of a freeze-dried lipid-stabilized microbubble formulation for ultrasound imaging and therapy. J Liposome Res. 2019;29:1-8

160. Paradossi G, Oddo L, Cerroni B, Ben-Harush C, Ariel E, Di Meco F. et al. In vivo toxicity study of engineered lipid microbubbles in rodents. ACS Omega. 2019;4:5526-33

161. Park J, Park D, Shin U, Moon S, Kim C, Kim HS. et al. Synthesis of laboratory ultrasound contrast agents. Molecules. 2013;18:13078-95

162. Iwasaki R, Nagaoka R, Yoshizawa S, Umemura Si. Selective detection of cavitation bubbles by triplet pulse sequence in high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2018;57:7S1

163. Cheng M, Li F, Han T, Yu ACH, Qin P. Effects of ultrasound pulse parameters on cavitation properties of flowing microbubbles under physiologically relevant conditions. Ultrason Sonochem. 2019;52:512-21

164. Zhang C, Huang PT, Zhang Y, Chen J, Shentu WH, Sun Y. et al. Anti-tumor efficacy of ultrasonic cavitation is potentiated by concurrent delivery of anti-angiogenic drug in colon cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;347:105-13

165. Zhao YZ, Lin Q, Wong HL, Shen XT, Yang W, Xu HL. et al. Glioma-targeted therapy using Cilengitide nanoparticles combined with UTMD enhanced delivery. J Control Release. 2016;224:112-25

166. Park J, Aryal M, Vykhodtseva N, Zhang YZ, McDannold N. Evaluation of permeability, doxorubicin delivery, and drug retention in a rat brain tumor model after ultrasound-induced blood-tumor barrier disruption. J Control Release. 2017;250:77-85

167. Lin L, Fan Y, Gao F, Jin L, Li D, Sun W. et al. UTMD-promoted co-delivery of gemcitabine and MIR-21 inhibitor by dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer therapy. Theranostics. 2018;8:1923-39

168. Fan CH, Cheng YH, Ting CY, Ho YJ, Hsu PH, Liu HL. et al. Ultrasound/magnetic targeting with spio-dox-microbubble complex for image-guided drug delivery in brain tumors. Theranostics. 2016;6:1542-56

169. Liu L, Chang S, Sun J, Zhu S, Yin M, Zhu Y. et al. Ultrasound-mediated destruction of paclitaxel and oxygen loaded lipid microbubbles for combination therapy in ovarian cancer xenografts. Cancer Lett. 2015;361:147-54

170. Wang B, Zhai Y, Shi J, Zhuang L, Liu W, Zhang H. et al. Simultaneously overcome tumor vascular endothelium and extracellular matrix barriers via a non-destructive size-controlled nanomedicine. J Control Release. 2017;268:225-36

171. Zhang K, Xu H, Chen H, Jia X, Zheng S, Cai X. et al. CO2 bubbling-based 'Nanobomb' System for targetedly suppressing PANC-1 pancreatic tumor via low intensity ultrasound-activated inertial cavitation. Theranostics. 2015;5:1291-302

172. Zhang K, Xu H, Jia X, Chen Y, Ma M, Sun L. et al. Ultrasound-triggered nitric oxide release platform based on energy transformation for targeted inhibition of pancreatic tumor. ACS Nano. 2016;10:10816-28

Author contact

Corresponding address Corresponding author: Fang Yang, Email: yangfang2080edu.cn or Ning Gu, Email: guningedu.cn


Received 2019-6-14
Accepted 2019-10-11
Published 2020-1-1